[CWG-Stewardship] Verisign maintainer role

[Mueller, Milton L]

Was there any response to this?
The ICG did issue guidelines regarding the RZM relationship to ICANN – it is incorrect to say that the whole issue is out of scope. So a response about the status of this would be appreciated.

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Seun Ojedeji
Sent: Saturday, March 5, 2016 8:46 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Verisign maintainer role


Hi,

Even though this is out of our scope for CWG, does anyone know if verisign made any public/private statement indicating it will be willing to continue being the root maintainer post transition? If yes, apart from removing NTIA from the loop, will the terms be changing significantly (especially financially)?.

Not to put Chuck on the spot, perhaps @Chuck could kindly indulge me on this one. Will appreciate a response from you or any other person who knows.

Regards

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160308/65caf0bb/attachment.html>