[CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community

[Seun Ojedeji]

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On 10 Sep 2016 9:05 a.m., "Brenda Brewer" <brenda.brewer at icann.org> wrote:
> Discussed selection of CCG representatives.
>
Suggestion that CWG co-chairs act as interim CCG reps until a process
is figured out by the chartering organizations.
>

SO: Like I raised on the call, I think we may be putting too much
responsibilities on the Co-Chairs who are volunteers. I expect quite a lot
of developmental/setup activity will commence once these various groups are
formed, which may imply significant amount of time commitment. I will like
to suggest we select other members within the CWG to serve as interim
instead. However, whoever we select should include someone from the
intellectual property constituency as I think this would be their area of
strength. The interims should agree to report to the CWG/COs and make
decisions based on their approval.

>
ACTION (Client committee): instruct Sidley to draft a letter of
appointment of CCG reps.
>

SO: I left the room during this discussion, does the action above imply
that it has been concluded that we use the Co-Chairs? If that is the case,
I suggest a third interim member is selected from the intellectual property
constituency.

On a much lighter note, i hope it has been clarified that there is no
possible conflict in having PTI board members serve as CCG members.

Regards

> 5. AOB
>
> IRP will be functional by the time of the transition
>
> ACTION (CGWG): monitor development of IRP
>
> Next meeting 15 Sep @06:00UTC
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160910/cf0025ea/attachment.html>