[CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Sorry and apologies for typo

It was smeared ( juré in French )  and NOT smeared.

Kavouss

2016-09-11 10:13 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>:

> FWIW, my suggestion to include someone from IPC is highly based on the
> required skills for the job and I thought the IPC would readily have such
> people (considering the urgency to put an interim in place). It's also
> conditioned on the expectation that the CCG members will always "report to"
> and rely on the CO in their decision making.
>
> As at today, I remain one of the CWG member from ALAC. With due respect
> Kavouss, please do not make accusations that lacks fact. By the way, I
> checked the meaning of the word "smeared" and I don't think it was
> appropriate to use such word to describe my contribution.
>
> Regards
> Sent from my LG G4
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
> On 10 Sep 2016 8:45 p.m., "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Jonathan,
>
> I do not understand the argument of Seun that all of the sudden he becomes
> smeared supporter of Intellectual property.
>
> I do not understand that nor the support of Chuck.
>
> I do not think that we need additional person at all
>
> Kavouss
>
>
> 2016-09-10 16:51 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>:
>
>> Seun,
>>
>>
>>
>> Please note that the drafting of the letter of appointment (as per the
>> action you refer to) does not in any way pre-suppose the names of the
>> actual appointees.
>>
>>
>>
>> As the call records will show, I put a strawman out for the IANA IPR
>> Group as the initial appointees for the CCG reps; 2 x Co-chairs (of CWG)
>> plus Greg Shatan (as CCG Co-Chair).
>>
>>
>>
>> Any other suggestions / proposals are clearly very welcome.
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com]
>> *Sent:* 10 September 2016 13:51
>> *To:* Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>; Brenda Brewer <
>> brenda.brewer at icann.org>
>> *Cc:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community
>>
>>
>>
>> Seun,
>>
>>
>>
>> Note that it was suggested that Greg Shatan serve as one of the interim
>> CCG members; if we do that, it clearly would satisfy your recommendation
>> that “a third interim member is selected from the intellectual property
>> constituency”.
>>
>>
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounce
>> s at icann.org <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Seun
>> Ojedeji
>> *Sent:* Saturday, September 10, 2016 4:46 AM
>> *To:* Brenda Brewer
>> *Cc:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
>> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my LG G4
>> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>>
>> On 10 Sep 2016 9:05 a.m., "Brenda Brewer" <brenda.brewer at icann.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Discussed selection of CCG representatives.
>> > Suggestion that CWG co-chairs act as interim CCG reps until
>> a process is figured out by the chartering organizations.
>> >
>>
>> SO: Like I raised on the call, I think we may be putting too much
>> responsibilities on the Co-Chairs who are volunteers. I expect quite a lot
>> of developmental/setup activity will commence once these various groups are
>> formed, which may imply significant amount of time commitment. I will like
>> to suggest we select other members within the CWG to serve as interim
>> instead. However, whoever we select should include someone from the
>> intellectual property constituency as I think this would be their area of
>> strength. The interims should agree to report to the CWG/COs and make
>> decisions based on their approval.
>>
>> > ACTION (Client committee): instruct Sidley to draft a letter
>>  of appointment of CCG reps.
>> >
>>
>> SO: I left the room during this discussion, does the action above imply
>> that it has been concluded that we use the Co-Chairs? If that is the case,
>> I suggest a third interim member is selected from the intellectual property
>> constituency.
>>
>> On a much lighter note, i hope it has been clarified that there is no
>> possible conflict in having PTI board members serve as CCG members.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> > 5. AOB
>> >
>> > IRP will be functional by the time of the transition
>> >
>> > ACTION (CGWG): monitor development of IRP
>> >
>> > Next meeting 15 Sep @06:00UTC
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> > CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160911/36812ae8/attachment-0001.html>