[Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO Special Budget Request Liaison

Tue Feb 11 13:30:25 UTC 2014

To add to this list, the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP
Working Group has submitted a request to the GAC to provide input on its
charter questions by 28 February. Presumably this is more critical from a
public policy standpoint, and as a result it would be very helpful to obtain
GAC early input in the process, although the timing might not be ideal.

Best regards,

Marika

From:  Mike O'Connor <mike at haven2.com>
Date:  Tuesday 11 February 2014 14:00
To:  Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com>
Cc:  Ana Neves <Ana.Neves at fct.pt>, Marika Konings
<marika.konings at icann.org>, "gac-gnso-cgs at icann.org" <gac-gnso-cg at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO Special Budget Request Liaison

hi all, 

i woke up this morning with the beginning of an idea about interim
improvements that we could launch right away.  we have several GNSO
working-groups that are heading into public-comment periods that we might
use to try out some of our early-engagement ideas.

> the Inter Registrar Transfer Policy working group ‹ will likely publish and
> Initial Report in time for Singapore (i co-chair with Godaddy¹s James Bladel)
> 
> the Data and Metrics for Policy-Making working group ‹ this non-PDP WG has
> just been chartered and will soon be requesting comments from AC¹s and SO¹s as
> it begins its work (i chaired the charter drafting team, i¹m the Council
> Liaison to the group, and i haven¹t decided whether to chair/co-chair)

both of those represent opportunities for us to try out some ideas about GAC
comments and engagement at an earlier stage.  they are also not terribly
critical ones from a public-policy standpoint.  so if we make some mistakes,
not much harm done.

i picked those two out of our current pile because i¹ll be playing a
leadership role in both of them and could help smooth out any bumps in the
road.

mikey

On Feb 10, 2014, at 7:50 AM, Jonathan Robinson
<jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com> wrote:

> Thanks Ana,
>  
> You make a good point and a couple of meetings back I recall that I was
> supposed to kick off a discussion thread within our group on this topic.
>  
> The topic being along the lines of the following:
>  
> What interim measures do we put in place to ensure effective GNSO / GAC
> interaction whilst the work of this GAC/GNSO Engagement Group is underway?
>  
> At present we have:
>  
> 1.      The work of this group
> 
> 2.      A likely meeting between the GNSO and the GAC at the ICANN meetings
> (Singapore, London etc)
> 
> 3.      The Special Budget Request
> 
>  
> But none of this explicitly deals with ongoing liaison between the GAC & the
> GNSO on policy related work in advance of the work of this group.
> This does not suggest that there is no communication since we know there is
> regular scheduled communication as part of any PDP.
> But , there are currently no interim temporary improvements or modifications
> suggested. 
> 
> Is this a third work stream for this group?
>  
> Jonathan
>  
> 
> From:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Ana Neves
> Sent: 10 February 2014 13:14
> To: Marika Konings; gac-gnso-cgs at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO Special Budget Request Liaison
>  
> Dear all,
>  
> I would like to thank Marika and Olof for this draft of the FY15 Community
> Request Form to request travel support for a GNSO liaison to the GAC, to which
> I have no problems at all, as if it doesn¹t prejudice the discussion of any
> options, it helps to prevent us from any blockage in the future.
>  
> Nevertheless, I must say I¹m concerned with what might happen in 2014, a
> crucial year for this Early Engagement in Policy Development Process e.g. on
> gTLDs. 2015 will be an important year as well, but in 2014 we should start
> some pilot somehow as we have already discussed. I know my concern is not out
> from our discussion but I just wanted to make my point once again.
>  
> Thank you.
>  
> Looking forward to meeting everyone virtually tomorrow.
>  
> Ana
>  
>  
> 
> From:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Marika Konings
> Sent: segunda-feira, 10 de Fevereiro de 2014 12:48
> To: gac-gnso-cgs at icann.org
> Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO Special Budget Request Liaison
>  
> 
> Dear All,
> 
>  
> 
> As discussed, Olof and I have prepared a first draft of the FY15 Community
> Request Form to request travel support for a GNSO liaison to the GAC. As noted
> before, this request is in no way intended to prejudice the discussion on the
> different options that have been put forward to date and as such can be
> withdrawn at any point the consultation groups decides not to pursue this
> specific option any further. Please note that the deadline for submission is 7
> March.
> 
>  
> 
> We look forward to receiving your feedback.
> 
>  
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>  
> 
> Marika
> _______________________________________________
> Gac-gnso-cg mailing list
> Gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg

PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com
<http://www.haven2.com> , HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook,
LinkedIn, etc.)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140211/5b082c84/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5056 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140211/5b082c84/smime-0001.p7s>