[Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

[Olof Nordling]

Dear Manal,

I think you're right, although there may be different "flavors" of the
options - the "Group of existing GNSO Council PDP Liaisons interacting with
the GAC"

could for example be interacting with the corresponding topic leads of the
GAC, turning into a hybrid of the buddy system. Perhaps too early to
highlight

the exclusion aspect until we have had an initial discussion about the
options per se. Good point to bring up in that discussion, though!

Just my two Euro-cents.

Best

Olof

 

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org]
On Behalf Of Manal Ismail
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 11:23 AM
To: Marika Konings; gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

 

Thanks again Marika and Olof ..

Very well structured and thought out ..

 

Regarding the considered options, I believe some options can be implemented
simultaneously and some, if implemented, would automatically exclude others
.. For example, we can implement 'reverse liaison', 'recurring joint
meetings' as well as 'early awareness & notifications' all simultaneously ..
Yet if we agree to have "Group of existing GNSO Council PDP Liaisons
interacting with the GAC", this would automatically exclude having "Topic
Leads / Buddy System" implemented, right?

If yes, then I believe it would be useful if we also try to identify beside
the title of each option, other options it excludes .. As this would also
guide us later when comparing and contrasting pros & cons of each ..

 

Thoughts? 

 

Kind Regards

--Manal

 

 

From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings at icann.org] 
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:44 PM
To: Manal Ismail; gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

 

All, as mentioned by Manal, please find attached the updated table in which
we've provided some suggested language starting on page 2 (see attached). Do
note, that due to space limitations, we had to reorganise the table and
create separate ones for each option currently being explored. Also, we
added a row for overall assessment which will hopefully allow the
consultation group to summarise its views and allow easy comparison between
the different options. Of course, it goes without saying that our suggested
language should in no way be seen as restricting or directing the
conversation - it is merely intended to get the conversation started.

 

Best regards,

 

Marika

 

From: Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>
Date: Thursday 20 February 2014 12:59
To: "gac-gnso-cg at icann.org" <gac-gnso-cg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

 

Dear All ..

 

Marika and Olof have been very helpful in populating the table containing
the options to be considered for GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation, and will
be sending the populate table (now tables) shortly .. 

 

Meanwhile it would be appreciated if you confirm that the stated objectives,
expectationsand options are fine, in order to share with the GAC and the
GNSO ..

 

Kind Regards

--Manal  

 

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org]
On Behalf Of Manal Ismail
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 9:59 PM
To: gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

 

Dear All ..

 

Please find attached the document prepared by Marika and Olof on mechanisms
for GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation .. 

Further to our discussion during our last conference call, appreciate your
feedback on the following 2 points, before we start populating the table on
page 2 ..

1.       Confirm whether these are the objectives & expectations and/or
whether any additions / revisions are needed

2.       What are the options to be considered to achieve these objectives?
Any additional ones?

 

Looking forward to receiving your feedback ..

 

Kind Regards

--Manal

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140224/a0a52a4f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5503 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140224/a0a52a4f/smime-0001.p7s>