[Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

[Manal Ismail]

Thanks Olof .. You have a point ..

The options and their interdependency or mutual exclusivity will become
clearer as we further discuss the options in details ..

 

Kind Regards

--Manal 

 

From: Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling at icann.org] 
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 4:57 PM
To: Manal Ismail; Marika Konings; gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

 

Dear Manal,

I think you're right, although there may be different "flavors" of the
options - the "Group of existing GNSO Council PDP Liaisons interacting
with the GAC"

could for example be interacting with the corresponding topic leads of
the GAC, turning into a hybrid of the buddy system. Perhaps too early to
highlight

the exclusion aspect until we have had an initial discussion about the
options per se. Good point to bring up in that discussion, though!

Just my two Euro-cents.

Best

Olof

 

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Manal Ismail
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 11:23 AM
To: Marika Konings; gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

 

Thanks again Marika and Olof ..

Very well structured and thought out ..

 

Regarding the considered options, I believe some options can be
implemented simultaneously and some, if implemented, would automatically
exclude others .. For example, we can implement 'reverse liaison',
'recurring joint meetings' as well as 'early awareness & notifications'
all simultaneously .. Yet if we agree to have "Group of existing GNSO
Council PDP Liaisons interacting with the GAC", this would automatically
exclude having "Topic Leads / Buddy System" implemented, right?

If yes, then I believe it would be useful if we also try to identify
beside the title of each option, other options it excludes .. As this
would also guide us later when comparing and contrasting pros & cons of
each ..

 

Thoughts? 

 

Kind Regards

--Manal

 

 

From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings at icann.org] 
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:44 PM
To: Manal Ismail; gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

 

All, as mentioned by Manal, please find attached the updated table in
which we've provided some suggested language starting on page 2 (see
attached). Do note, that due to space limitations, we had to reorganise
the table and create separate ones for each option currently being
explored. Also, we added a row for overall assessment which will
hopefully allow the consultation group to summarise its views and allow
easy comparison between the different options. Of course, it goes
without saying that our suggested language should in no way be seen as
restricting or directing the conversation - it is merely intended to get
the conversation started.

 

Best regards,

 

Marika

 

From: Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>
Date: Thursday 20 February 2014 12:59
To: "gac-gnso-cg at icann.org" <gac-gnso-cg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

 

Dear All ..

 

Marika and Olof have been very helpful in populating the table
containing the options to be considered for GAC-GNSO day-to-day
cooperation, and will be sending the populate table (now tables) shortly
.. 

 

Meanwhile it would be appreciated if you confirm that the stated
objectives, expectationsand options are fine, in order to share with the
GAC and the GNSO ..

 

Kind Regards

--Manal  

 

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Manal Ismail
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 9:59 PM
To: gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

 

Dear All ..

 

Please find attached the document prepared by Marika and Olof on
mechanisms for GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation .. 

Further to our discussion during our last conference call, appreciate
your feedback on the following 2 points, before we start populating the
table on page 2 ..

1.       Confirm whether these are the objectives & expectations and/or
whether any additions / revisions are needed

2.       What are the options to be considered to achieve these
objectives? Any additional ones?

 

Looking forward to receiving your feedback ..

 

Kind Regards

--Manal

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140224/cbb4b76a/attachment-0001.html>