[Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

[Suzanne Radell]

I would concur with both of you, and think the idea of developing pros and cons is an excellent way to assess the different options.

I must send regrets that I cannot be on tomorrow's call, due to an unexpected conflict.  I look forward to learning the results of the call.  Best regards, Suz

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Olof Nordling
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 9:57 AM
To: Manal Ismail; Marika Konings; gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

Dear Manal,
I think you're right, although there may be different "flavors" of the options - the "Group of existing GNSO Council PDP Liaisons interacting with the GAC"
could for example be interacting with the corresponding topic leads of the GAC, turning into a hybrid of the buddy system. Perhaps too early to highlight
the exclusion aspect until we have had an initial discussion about the options per se. Good point to bring up in that discussion, though!
Just my two Euro-cents.
Best
Olof

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Manal Ismail
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 11:23 AM
To: Marika Konings; gac-gnso-cg at icann.org<mailto:gac-gnso-cg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

Thanks again Marika and Olof ..
Very well structured and thought out ..

Regarding the considered options, I believe some options can be implemented simultaneously and some, if implemented, would automatically exclude others .. For example, we can implement 'reverse liaison', 'recurring joint meetings' as well as 'early awareness & notifications' all simultaneously .. Yet if we agree to have "Group of existing GNSO Council PDP Liaisons interacting with the GAC", this would automatically exclude having "Topic Leads / Buddy System" implemented, right?
If yes, then I believe it would be useful if we also try to identify beside the title of each option, other options it excludes .. As this would also guide us later when comparing and contrasting pros & cons of each ..

Thoughts?

Kind Regards
--Manal


From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings at icann.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:44 PM
To: Manal Ismail; gac-gnso-cg at icann.org<mailto:gac-gnso-cg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

All, as mentioned by Manal, please find attached the updated table in which we've provided some suggested language starting on page 2 (see attached). Do note, that due to space limitations, we had to reorganise the table and create separate ones for each option currently being explored. Also, we added a row for overall assessment which will hopefully allow the consultation group to summarise its views and allow easy comparison between the different options. Of course, it goes without saying that our suggested language should in no way be seen as restricting or directing the conversation - it is merely intended to get the conversation started.

Best regards,

Marika

From: Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg<mailto:manal at tra.gov.eg>>
Date: Thursday 20 February 2014 12:59
To: "gac-gnso-cg at icann.org<mailto:gac-gnso-cg at icann.org>" <gac-gnso-cg at icann.org<mailto:gac-gnso-cg at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

Dear All ..

Marika and Olof have been very helpful in populating the table containing the options to be considered for GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation, and will be sending the populate table (now tables) shortly ..

Meanwhile it would be appreciated if you confirm that the stated objectives, expectationsand options are fine, in order to share with the GAC and the GNSO ..

Kind Regards
--Manal

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Manal Ismail
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 9:59 PM
To: gac-gnso-cg at icann.org<mailto:gac-gnso-cg at icann.org>
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..

Dear All ..

Please find attached the document prepared by Marika and Olof on mechanisms for GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation ..
Further to our discussion during our last conference call, appreciate your feedback on the following 2 points, before we start populating the table on page 2 ..

1.      Confirm whether these are the objectives & expectations and/or whether any additions / revisions are needed

2.      What are the options to be considered to achieve these objectives? Any additional ones?

Looking forward to receiving your feedback ..

Kind Regards
--Manal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140224/daf2ee99/attachment.html>