[Gac-gnso-cg] PDP work track ..

[Marika Konings]

As you might have expected, I disagree with Mikey on not going through the
PDP questions. By not reviewing how current engagement takes place as part
of the PDP process and trying to understand why it is not working, what
improvements can be made to the existing process and/or what additional
actions need to be taken, I think we miss an important part of the
discussion. The PPT seems to already jump ahead to what possible
improvements may look like without considering in depth why the current
engagement opportunities do not meet the objectives. By not understanding
the underlying reasons and addressing those, any new mechanisms are likely
to meet the same fateŠ. Just my two cents.

Best regards,

Marika

From:  Mike O'Connor <mike at haven2.com>
Date:  Tuesday 25 February 2014 17:16
To:  Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>
Cc:  "gac-gnso-cg at icann.org" <gac-gnso-cg at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] PDP work track ..

hi Manal and all, 

1)  i am fine with the idea of moving those last 2 columns out of the PDP
early-engagement stream ‹ either over to day-to-da, or UP a level.  it seems
to me that those two ideas are useful for both workstreams.

2)  it seems to me that we have quite a lot to discuss with our colleagues
at the Singapore meeting.  so my thought would be to thin out our
presentations to a few slides, skipping over any of the sections that we
haven¹t completed.

i¹m also not convinced that we need to beat ourselves to death with all the
questions that Marika is proposing.  ;-)    (sorry Marika)

m

On Feb 25, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg> wrote:

> Dear All ..
>  
> Reference to the above mentioned subject and the attached documents, I would
> like to kick-start the discussion with a couple of questions I have and would
> hand over to Mikey and Suzanne as the work leads:
> 1.      Should the last 2 columns, namely 'Improve coordination between
> GAC/GNSO Secretariats' & 'Improve process awareness and notifications, both
> directions', be moved to the day-to-day co-operation discussion?
> 
> 2.      How are we going to structure our discussion online? We have 3 weeks
> left to Singapore and 6 options to discuss, fill in potential issues (I
> believe initially from the document prepared by Marika) and propose how each
> option would work in practice (I believe initially from Suzanne¹s/US
> suggestion included in the document prepared by Marika) .. Those options may
> decrease to 4 if we decide to move the above mentioned 2 columns to our
> day-to-day discussion ..
> 
>  
> Over to you Mikey and Suzanne ..
>  
> Kind Regards
> --Manal
>  
>  
> 
> From:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Manal Ismail
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:07 PM
> To: gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
> Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Agenda for Tues. Feb. 25th cc ..
>  
> Dear All ..
>  
> Please find below the suggested agenda for tomorrow¹s conference call ..
>  
> 1.      Day-to-day work track
> 
> (Working document prepared by Marika and Olof ­ Version circulated by Marika
> on Feb. 20th, 2014)
> 
>  
> 2.      PDP work track
> 
> (Working document prepared by Mikey and Suzanne ­ Version circulated by Mikey
> on Feb. 20th, 2014)
> 
>  
> 3.      Agree on material ready to be shared in preparation for Singapore
> 
> o  Active GNSO WGs (attached)
> 
> o  Mechanism for day-to-day co-operation (attached version ­ with unpopulated
> table)
> 
>  
> 4.      Agree on expectations from both work tracks for the following call
> (Note: Next call scheduled for 11 March 2014, 14h00 UTC)
> 
>  
> 5.      AOB 
> 
>  
> All referenced documents are attached for your convenience ..
>  
> Kind Regards
> --Manal
>  
>  
> <PDP Graphics - GAC-GNSO v5.ppt><GAC Engagement in GNSO PDP - MO
> questions[1].doc>


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com
<http://www.haven2.com> , HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook,
LinkedIn, etc.)



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140226/faf43198/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5056 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140226/faf43198/smime-0001.p7s>