[Gac-gnso-cg] additional questions for the table that Jonathan circulated

[Mike O'Connor]

ah!

i misunderstood N/A to mean “not applicable” — maybe something like “No method at this time” would work better.

thanks!

mikey


On Jan 8, 2014, at 8:10 AM, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:

> Mikey, in relation to your question on why it states 'N/A' in different places, this relates to the column 'current method for seeking input'. For those items there is currently no specific method for seeking input, which of course does not mean that those are or couldn't be important elements by which the GAC can engage in the GNSO Policy Development Process.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Marika
> 
> From: Mike O'Connor <mike at haven2.com>
> Date: Wednesday 8 January 2014 15:03
> To: "GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org" <GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org>
> Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] additional questions for the table that Jonathan	circulated
> 
> hi all,
> 
> i went through the table that Jonathan circulated earlier this week and added some questions, and a “yes!” comment on the Appendix.  here’s my draft
> 
> mikey
> 


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140108/ddd8e51c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140108/ddd8e51c/smime.p7s>