[Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial, unedited notes from today's teleconference

[Mike O'Connor]

hi all,

i’m also quite keen on the idea of co-chairs.   if some of you others would volunteer for the “day to day” one, Suzanne and i could team up on the “early engagement” one — he said, selfishly.  :-)

mikey
 
On Jan 10, 2014, at 7:18 AM, Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg> wrote:

> Many thanks Mikey and Suzanne for volunteering ..
> Thanks Suzanne for your flexibility .. I support the idea of co-chairing as far as the leads agree and we have enough volunteers J ..
> Looking forward to hearing other colleagues views ..
> Kind Regards
> --Manal
>  
> From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Suzanne Radell
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 8:06 PM
> To: Jonathan Robinson; 'Mike O'Connor'
> Cc: GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial, unedited notes from today's teleconference
>  
> Hi all, if need be, I will be happy to shift to the “day to day” issue, to permit us to have at least one lead for each topic.  I am still interested in hearing others’ views regarding the concept of shared leads for each topic.  Best regards, Suz
>  
> From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 12:42 PM
> To: 'Mike O'Connor'; Suzanne Radell
> Cc: GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
> Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial, unedited notes from today's teleconference
>  
> We have two topics and two volunteers so far.  One from GAC and one from GNSO – possibly for the same topic?
>  
> We did not put a deadline / time for when the leads need to be in place but agreed the need for speed.
>  
> Therefore, I suggest we work to a deadline of tomorrow (midnight UTC) and then move ahead with the work of the two groups next week.
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Jonathan
>  
> From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
> Sent: 08 January 2014 15:50
> To: Suzanne Radell
> Cc: GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial, unedited notes from today's teleconference
>  
> hi Suzanne,
>  
> dang.  i just had a brain-dead day yesterday.  i put the “early engagement in the PDP” phrase up in the subject line of my note — i should have repeated it down in the body.  anyway, that’s the one i was volunteering to help with as well — i’m pretty familiar with the PDP.  i’m completely unfamiliar with the issues associated with the “day to day cooperation” part.
>  
> all that said, i’d be completely fine with you as the rapporteur on the Early Engagement piece.  i’ll be a really active participant.  
>  
> but if you wanted, you could switch to Day to Day Cooperation.
>  
> thanks,
>  
> mikey
>  
>  
> On Jan 8, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Suzanne Radell <SRadell at ntia.doc.gov> wrote:
>  
> 
> Hi all, and many thanks for the exchanges yesterday during our call.  I’d be happy to volunteer to either lead or co-lead (what do you all think of a GAC-GNSO shared lead?) the second piece of the project, GAC early engagement in GNSO PDPs.  If I’ve understood Mikey’s email properly, he has volunteered to lead the day to day cooperation element, yes?  If not, my apologies.  Best regards, Suz
>  
> Suzanne Murray Radell
> Senior Policy Advisor, NTIA/OIA
> 202-482-3167
>  
>  
>  
> From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Manal Ismail
> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 5:53 AM
> To: Mike O'Connor; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial, unedited notes from today's teleconference
>  
> Many thanks Mikey for volunteering to take notes of yesterday's call and for sending them so quickly !!
>  
> We, Jonathan and I, would like to particularly highlight the following urgent actions, for those who were not on the call yesterday:
>  
> -          The deadline for submitting comments on the charter was agreed to be next Friday, Jan. 10th
> -          Call for volunteers to lead 2 tracks of work, GAC-GNSO day-to-day cooperation & GAC Early Engagement in GNSO PDP .. Both agreed to work in parallel with 2 different leads and the participation of the entire group
>  
> Looking forward to receiving comments and welcoming volunteers ..
>  
> Kind regards
> --Manal
>  
>  
> From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 5:20 PM
> To: GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
> Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial,unedited notes from today's teleconference
>  
> GAC GNSO 7-Jan
> 
> 1. Summarise status quo
>  
> + - 2. Scope of Work - Charter
> o    Remove "yet to be addressed" line
> 
> + - "Initial proposal" -- are there any beyond the Reverse Liason?
> 
> Table -- circulated to the list
> + - Reverse liaison -- on the table --
> There may be opportunities for additional mechanisms
> Looking for ideas to complement Reverse Liaison
> Ask staff for proposals and ideas
> + - Highlight the problem of "different working methods"
> 
> Hard to maintain the current "episodic" norm
> Matching GAC working methods with the current process
> + - Amplify in "what it problem to be solved" -- perhaps add to a different section as well
> Appears in Chronology section
> Appears in Objectives -- perhaps clarify/amplify here
> Taking the Joint Report as a given -- presuming that there's agreement
> Title - GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on GAC Early Engagement in Policy Development Processes
> 
> Should "Who will be affected...." change to "Who is impacted by this issue and proposals resulting from this consultation group"?
> 
> Clarify timeline
> 
> Clarify whether this is a one-time effort, or an ongoing iterative project
> 
> + - Stakeholders:
> 
> Iron out the differences between staff structure -- include Secretariats
> Anyone interested in gtld policy -- explicitly mention GAC and GNSO
> + - Out Scope
> 
> Timely exchange of information
> Delete the phrase from "out of scope”?
>  
> + - 3. Way forward - work plan from here
> Approach in the charter is OK - two tracks w/leaders, work as a single group
>  
> + - 4. Practical issues including meeting times
> Time of day works
> Meeting *dates* are more difficult -- maybe the focus of the Doodle poll?
>  
> 5. AOB
>  
> + - Actions
> All - review and propose edits -- by Friday this week
> Charter group - finalize draft for next meeting
> All - consider volunteering to lead one of the 2 tracks of work
> All - react to the questions in the table that Jonathan circulated to the list
> Chairs? -- get on the agendas of our respective org's - progress/update  
>  
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
>  
>  
> 
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
>  


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140110/63ea7ad2/attachment-0001.html>