[Gac-gnso-cg] For your review & input - notes and doodle poll

[Manal Ismail]

Many thanks Marika for the detailed, accurate and quick notes ..

Kind Regards

--Manal

 

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 5:17 PM
To: gac-gnso-cg at icann.org
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] For your review & input - notes and doodle poll

 

Dear All,

 

Please find below the notes of today's GAC-GNSO Consultation Group
meeting. You are encouraged to review the notes as well as the attached
draft quick look mechanism flow chart (see page 2) and provide any
comments, questions or input you may have.

 

The next meeting will be scheduled for Tuesday 2 December at 14.00 UTC.
In order to assess whether there will be sufficient members to
participate in the upcoming meeting as well as subsequent meetings
leading up to Singapore, please complete the following doodle poll to
confirm your availability: http://doodle.com/p6k57qd5qgz4t5e5.

 

Best regards,

 

Marika

 

Notes 18 November 2014:

 

Quick look / triage mechanism discussion- Confirm agreed upon points:

*	Focus on early engagement (Issue Report phase), does not
preclude engagement in later stages, but focus is currently on early
engagement
*	Focus is on GAC input - individual government input is already
an option and GAC input does not necessarily replace that option
*	Need for early indication from the GAC whether the topic is of
interest and input will be provided / want to remain informed / not of
specific interest - although indication could change over time
*	Need to prioritize and streamline input by the GAC
*	Timing of quick - look mechanism: is that something that can be
done between ICANN meetings or does that require GAC F2F meeting?
Consider building in safeguard option that in principle it could be
managed through online communications, but in specific circumstances a
request could be made for the quick look mechanism to be discussed /
considered during a GAC F2F meeting
*	Flexibility on the GNSO side to accomodate GAC if it has
indicated it wants to provide input but needs more time to provide such
input. PDP provides a lot of flexibility as it mainly refers to minimum
duration, not maximum - important however to set expectations and allow
for advance notice to ensure planning by GNSO Council and/or PDP WG.
*	Duration / timing of quick look mechanism could be a potential
discussion point for GAC based on a more detailed strawman, as well as
wether certain elements require F2F time or not. 
*	Triggers on GNSO side to trigger the need for input on the GNSO
side e.g. anything related to national laws, anything related to
previous GAC advice. May not always be possible for GNSO to make such a
determination - Council may be to inform the GAC about the issues it is
working on so that the GAC can make this determination. Council cannot
decide for the GAC whether an issue deserves its attention or not. GAC
support staff might also be able to play a role here.

Other discussion points:

*	What information would need to be provided for the GAC to
consider quick look mechanism? GNSO Issue Report Request form could
serve as a starting point. Could additions to this template be
considered such as, for example, are you aware of GAC advice on this
issue? Possible question to GAC: what information would be needed.
Quesiton to the GNSO: could additional fields be added to the GNSO Issue
Report Request Form. Question 7 could possibly be expanded to identify
public policy considerations which may facilitate identification of GAC
work on a certain issue?
*	Also ensure input from GAC support staff during the development
of the Issue Report stage to ensure that all relevant information is
included relating to existing GAC views on the topic. 
*	Ask template used by ccNSO for their triage commitee - outcomes
of this process can be viewed here:
http://ccnso.icann.org/about/council/decisions.htm.
*	All encouraged to provide input on the draft quick look flow
chart

Singapore Planning

*	What does the group want to share with the GAC and GNSO in
Singapore?
*	How to engage GNSO and GAC in conversations? Specific questions
may assist in this effort.
*	Confirm next meetings on the list and conduct doodle poll to
confirm that sufficient members are available to participate

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20141119/dd531ff1/attachment.html>