[Gnso-epdp-idn-team] Reminder: Draft Output: Charter Questions A7, B4, D1b, E5, E6

[Justine Chew]

Hello Ariel, all,

I am submitting the ALAC Team's comments on their behalf:

   - A7: We have a suggestion for consideration - which is to explicitly
   encourage the CJK GPs to complete its work on the guidelines for a
   prohibitive list of Han characters in time to be implemented, post public
   comment, in time for the next round. (see p. 15 of
   https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Bt0LT45UaLynFNverh1nJhyvq6q6NxgSFAOnOp2LG44/edit
   )
   - A7: Agree with need to rectify typo spotted by Dennis (see p. 15 of
   https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Bt0LT45UaLynFNverh1nJhyvq6q6NxgSFAOnOp2LG44/edit
   )
   - E5: Noting a couple of words as possibly missing from the last
   paragraph of the rationale for Rec 3.10 (see p. 5 of
   https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RLvsyQvliafNEA9Ja1RCObywpAWfp1kTmte0WZlyqqs/edit
   )


We are reserving our comments on Rec 2.6 and IG x.x in light of the
discussions in the EPDP Team Call yesterday (2 Feb), and also because the
present call for comments to CQ D1b  was limited to only Rec 2.9 and Rec
2.10 per your email of 19 Jan.

Thanks,
Justine



On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 at 04:48, Tan Tanaka, Dennis via Gnso-epdp-idn-team <
gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org> wrote:

> Hi Ariel,
>
>
>
> Here are my observations:
>
>    - One potential minor sequence typo on P.15
>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Bt0LT45UaLynFNverh1nJhyvq6q6NxgSFAOnOp2LG44/edit
>    - A follow-up comment on IG for Rec 2.6 on P.3
>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C6xKX87w2LtN4Is0mehuRgc1GqjKmbbhT14KbvUH5Sw/edit
>
> The rest looks good to me, consistent to our group deliberations.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Dennis
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Gnso-epdp-idn-team <gnso-epdp-idn-team-bounces at icann.org> on
> behalf of Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, February 2, 2023 at 9:04 AM
> *To: *"gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org" <gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-idn-team] Reminder: Draft Output:
> Charter Questions A7, B4, D1b, E5, E6
>
>
>
> *Caution:* This email originated from outside the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> This is a reminder to kindly provide your input for the new draft text
> highlighted below by EOB tomorrow (Thursday, 2 February).
>
>
>
> Thank you for your review!
>
> Ariel
>
>
>
> *From: *Ariel Liang <ariel.liang at icann.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 12:17 PM
> *To: *"gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org" <gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Draft Output: Charter Questions A7, B4, D1b, E5, E6
>
>
>
> Dear All
>
>
>
> As mentioned by Donna during today’s call, please find the new batch of
> draft output text in response to the following charter questions. The draft
> text is included in the google docs as redlines.
>
> ·         *A7, Rec 1.14*, pp.13-15:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Bt0LT45UaLynFNverh1nJhyvq6q6NxgSFAOnOp2LG44/edit
>
> ·         *B4, Recs 2.11-2.14*, pp.3-5:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/15YGISgNQYL_VfcVVZ6E97qbo42GPziP6x089bR3wgZw/edit
>
> ·         *D1b, Recs 2.9-10*, pp.2-3, 5-6:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C6xKX87w2LtN4Is0mehuRgc1GqjKmbbhT14KbvUH5Sw/edit
>
> o   *Note: the redlines on Recs 2.6 and Rec 2.xx require additional
> discussion by the EPDP Team in conjunction with the review of ICANN org
> input. Only the new recs 2.9-10 and their rationale are requested to be
> reviewed this round. *
>
> ·         *E5, Recs 3.10-3.11*, pp.3-6:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RLvsyQvliafNEA9Ja1RCObywpAWfp1kTmte0WZlyqqs/edit
>
> ·         *E6, *p.6:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RLvsyQvliafNEA9Ja1RCObywpAWfp1kTmte0WZlyqqs/edit
>
>
> All of these documents are also posted on the wiki page here:
> https://community.icann.org/x/XwyHCg
> <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1kEahH40zPEL_zqVMFyRAGXMU3z8Rb92oNBwvnpXh5zCo5kEZPvmtAFgSCDvZ_tjb89_TiaJVQziQXhpolFaX-dIl40YoRiFNPOzs6dYuog2kQHjiq22UYgct538Xa8gsePXEC1IIkX6KY2BmFhCkHsrVJYP-5kRJUJxfWF8F0cmvxHjxbYS_-zBZC1IFq0Ti03m0_hQ7KHSGhs1LKwDv1RjlZELS1skGr_acOYcZ8xdCNAFlvILgcXEyEhmzoZm6MpRHFeemhbeBxsbkE_t8-5VueL7MkDP6UdWfQrxPp0mPB89g1UM0cRUubDt95YRu/https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.icann.org%2Fx%2FXwyHCg>
> .
>
>
>
> Following the agreed format, the draft output language includes the
> following components:
>
> ·         Brief answer to the charter question
>
> ·         Recommendations and implementation guidance
>
> ·         Rationale for recommendations and implementation guidance
>
> Please provide any input/suggestion for the draft outcome language on the *mailing
> list* by *EOB Thursday, 2 February*.
>
>
>
> Thank you for your review!
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ariel, Steve, Emily
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-idn-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-idn-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-idn-team
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-idn-team/attachments/20230203/af75a3ad/attachment.html>