[Gnso-epdp-legal] For Legal Committee Review: Consolidated Legal v. Natural questions

[STROUNGI Melina]

Dear EPDP colleagues,

Just to let you know that I introduced an edit (in highlight as for some reason track changes seem to be disabled).

As I did not want to alter the substance of the questions already raised I preferred to raise this question separately (it is the same question I raised during our meetings and there was no objection from anyone; nor do I see a harm in asking. On the contrary, it could help clarify).

Hope this is fine.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CqczmN_ShkDFgx05q8AyUX5iDM2u5dul/edit

Best regards,
Melina


From: Gnso-epdp-legal <gnso-epdp-legal-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen via Gnso-epdp-legal
Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 2:57 PM
To: gnso-epdp-legal at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-legal] For Legal Committee Review: Consolidated Legal v. Natural questions

Apologies for the additional email. Please use this link for the consolidated L v. N questions: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CqczmN_ShkDFgx05q8AyUX5iDM2u5dul/edit<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1CqczmN_ShkDFgx05q8AyUX5iDM2u5dul/edit__;!!DOxrgLBm!VcPhj64uakuaQONjMPhe-OyqzVETty3sUZwbmj75w7rOLZapBWB0EiH21aVQ-BV5H3dONavb$>.

As noted below, please respond no later than COB on Friday 5 March if you strongly object to the revised questions.  Absent reasoned objection, we will notify the plenary of our intent to submit those questions to B&B.

Best regards,

Berry, Marika, and Caitlin



From: Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org<mailto:caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>>
Date: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 at 9:55 PM
To: "gnso-epdp-legal at icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-legal at icann.org>" <gnso-epdp-legal at icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-legal at icann.org>>
Subject: For Legal Committee Review: Consolidated Legal v. Natural questions

Sent on behalf of Becky Burr:

Dear ePDP Legal Team colleagues:

As promised, please find modest revisions to Questions 1-6 relating to Legal/Natural Person issues following our discussion today: https://docs.google.com/document/d/16SQJ3dfUuVKZJOQrKnBFqkUwmqIpQjCG/edit#<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/16SQJ3dfUuVKZJOQrKnBFqkUwmqIpQjCG/edit__;!!DOxrgLBm!VcPhj64uakuaQONjMPhe-OyqzVETty3sUZwbmj75w7rOLZapBWB0EiH21aVQ-BV5H4W4zdXh$>.

With respect to reformatted questions 1 - 3, covering original questions 1-4, please respond no later than COB on Friday 5 March if you strongly object to the revised questions.  Absent reasoned objection, we will notify the plenary of our intent to submit those questions to B&B.

With respect to the reformatted question on EURid/RIPE-NCC, you will see that I have retained the background material on EURid and Article 16.  Please review and submit any comments by COB on Friday 5 March in preparation for a brief decisional conversation on Tuesday.

Thank you.

Becky
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-legal/attachments/20210305/6483ad4a/attachment.html>