[Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys

[Marika Konings]

Kavouss, I believe Milton is supporting the comment from Marc that appears further down in the email thread:

“I have some questions on the timing of the surveys.  Two days between the survey 1 due date and the survey 2 due date is very tight.  Realistically that isn’t enough time to coordinate a fulsome single response among the ePDP members and the constituency groups we represent.  If for example during meeting #2 on 7 Aug we only get half way through the discussion on part 1 of the survey results, will there be flexibility to allow more time for the survey 2 responses?”

Best regards,

Marika

From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 at 11:27
To: "Mueller, Milton L" <milton at gatech.edu>
Cc: "gnso-epdp-team at icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys

Dear All
Could someone , Marc or Milton attach Marc comment that was supported .
Regards
Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone

On 7 Aug 2018, at 09:29, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu<mailto:milton at gatech.edu>> wrote:
I want to support and second what Marc says here about timing. Now that we know how long it took us to respond to Survey 1, it’s very clear that we will not be able to respond properly to Survey 2 by the scheduled time. We will need to re-set those dates on our next call.

Dr. Milton L. Mueller
Professor, School of Public Policy
Georgia Institute of Technology
NCSG



From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Anderson, Marc via Gnso-epdp-team
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 12:19 PM
To: caitlin.tubergen at icann.org<mailto:caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>; gnso-epdp-team at icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys

All,

I have some questions on the timing of the surveys.  Two days between the survey 1 due date and the survey 2 due date is very tight.  Realistically that isn’t enough time to coordinate a fulsome single response among the ePDP members and the constituency groups we represent.  If for example during meeting #2 on 7 Aug we only get half way through the discussion on part 1 of the survey results, will there be flexibility to allow more time for the survey 2 responses?

Also, Part 4 has a larger gap with two meetings between it and Part 3 and is due on a Sunday.  Is this intentional?

Thank you,
Marc



From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org>> On Behalf Of Caitlin Tubergen
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2018 5:43 PM
To: gnso-epdp-team at icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] EPDP Team - Temporary Specification Input Surveys

Dear All:

In order to facilitate the triage of the Temporary Specification as outlined in the EPDP Team Charter as the first deliverable, please work with your appointing organization team members to complete the below surveys. Please find the relevant survey links and accompanying deadlines below:


  1.  Part 1, due Monday, 6 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CC6F9F8
  2.  Part 2, due Wednesday, 8 August by 2018 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7BMRCNS
  3.  Part 3, due Monday, 13 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7PWQPP7
  4.  Part 4, due Sunday, 19 August 2018 by 23:59 UTC: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/9KD5K79

Thank you.

Best regards,

Marika, Berry, and Caitlin



_______________________________________________
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20180807/3e7143da/attachment.html>