[Gnso-epdp-team] ICANN org question response
Caitlin Tubergen
caitlin.tubergen at icann.org
Tue Nov 20 00:49:47 UTC 2018
Hello Julf and Team,
Please find ICANN org's response to this question below:
QUESTION: I understand this answer addresses access to existing registration data, but not mandating collection of new data (the topic of the question)?
RESPONSE : Yes, maintenance and access to registration data generally is within the list of allowed topics, whether it is existing fields or new ones that the GNSO might recommend.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Marika, Berry and Caitlin
On 11/14/18, 8:50 AM, "Gnso-epdp-team on behalf of Johan Helsingius" <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org on behalf of julf at julf.com> wrote:
Dear Caitlin,
I understand this answer addresses access to existing registration
data, but not mandating collection of new data (the topic of the
question)?
Julf
On 14-11-18 14:16, Caitlin Tubergen wrote:
> Dear EPDP Team,
>
>
>
> In response to a question posed by the EPDP Team to ICANN org on
> Thursday, 8 November, please find the following response:
>
> QUESTION: Is making the natural vs legal distinction in WHOIS within the
> picket fence, i.e., a suitable topic for policy discussion?
>
> RESPONSE : Yes, access to gTLD registration data generally is one of the
> allowed topics for consensus policy as set forth in ICANN
> Bylaws and registry and registrar agreements. (That list of topics is
> referred to by some as “the picket fence”). Please refer to Annex G-1
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_pages_bylaws-2D2018-2D06-2D22-2Den-23annexG1&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8K75qGdDlOta4kh6k2F0jrT195M3tF3J_Fxcz6EvuG2kYKDeA67ZTEnthHXAPVXH&m=zQO9aagKp2dC89HXD1GhTs9r2VIqmHL9NqxJae3HGUI&s=HkGmV_YXLbnmVVUHSHcGwoqzANAF3U0RhsYp2ZHf00E&e=> and G-2
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_pages_bylaws-2D2018-2D06-2D22-2Den-23annexG2&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8K75qGdDlOta4kh6k2F0jrT195M3tF3J_Fxcz6EvuG2kYKDeA67ZTEnthHXAPVXH&m=zQO9aagKp2dC89HXD1GhTs9r2VIqmHL9NqxJae3HGUI&s=VsAM1vuRBUpiU0v-rPzKnfiK1yhzAz3k0ApLW5xkKFQ&e=> of
> the ICANN Bylaws as well as Specification 1 Section 1.3.4
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_sites_default_files_agreements_agreement-2Dapproved-2D31jul17-2Den.html-23specification1.1&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8K75qGdDlOta4kh6k2F0jrT195M3tF3J_Fxcz6EvuG2kYKDeA67ZTEnthHXAPVXH&m=zQO9aagKp2dC89HXD1GhTs9r2VIqmHL9NqxJae3HGUI&s=OFNAyhbPchPz3vLH_5Nlie6t8VSem9yv6p8XWwVvHIo&e=> of
> the Base Registry Agreement and the Consensus Policies and Temporary
> Policies Specification
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_pages_approved-2Dwith-2Dspecs-2D2013-2D09-2D17-2Den-23consensus-2Dtemporary&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8K75qGdDlOta4kh6k2F0jrT195M3tF3J_Fxcz6EvuG2kYKDeA67ZTEnthHXAPVXH&m=zQO9aagKp2dC89HXD1GhTs9r2VIqmHL9NqxJae3HGUI&s=E1iSnuew0fltRyCuFeS3cjQ0YcTLkf-ae_lyOwbqXIc&e=> of
> the Registrar Accreditation Agreement, which provide that: “maintenance
> of andaccess to accurate and up-to-date information concerning domain
> name registrations” is one of the topics on which ICANN may enforce
> consensus policies.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Marika, Berry and Caitlin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
>
_______________________________________________
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4621 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20181120/741565f7/smime.p7s>
More information about the Gnso-epdp-team
mailing list