[Gnso-epdp-team] ICANN org question response
Johan Helsingius
julf at julf.com
Tue Nov 20 07:51:57 UTC 2018
Thank you, Caitlin.
Julf
On 20-11-18 01:49, Caitlin Tubergen wrote:
> Hello Julf and Team,
>
> Please find ICANN org's response to this question below:
>
> QUESTION: I understand this answer addresses access to existing registration data, but not mandating collection of new data (the topic of the question)?
>
> RESPONSE : Yes, maintenance and access to registration data generally is within the list of allowed topics, whether it is existing fields or new ones that the GNSO might recommend.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika, Berry and Caitlin
>
> On 11/14/18, 8:50 AM, "Gnso-epdp-team on behalf of Johan Helsingius" <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org on behalf of julf at julf.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Caitlin,
>
> I understand this answer addresses access to existing registration
> data, but not mandating collection of new data (the topic of the
> question)?
>
> Julf
>
>
> On 14-11-18 14:16, Caitlin Tubergen wrote:
> > Dear EPDP Team,
> >
> >
> >
> > In response to a question posed by the EPDP Team to ICANN org on
> > Thursday, 8 November, please find the following response:
> >
> > QUESTION: Is making the natural vs legal distinction in WHOIS within the
> > picket fence, i.e., a suitable topic for policy discussion?
> >
> > RESPONSE : Yes, access to gTLD registration data generally is one of the
> > allowed topics for consensus policy as set forth in ICANN
> > Bylaws and registry and registrar agreements. (That list of topics is
> > referred to by some as “the picket fence”). Please refer to Annex G-1
> > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_pages_bylaws-2D2018-2D06-2D22-2Den-23annexG1&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8K75qGdDlOta4kh6k2F0jrT195M3tF3J_Fxcz6EvuG2kYKDeA67ZTEnthHXAPVXH&m=zQO9aagKp2dC89HXD1GhTs9r2VIqmHL9NqxJae3HGUI&s=HkGmV_YXLbnmVVUHSHcGwoqzANAF3U0RhsYp2ZHf00E&e=> and G-2
> > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_pages_bylaws-2D2018-2D06-2D22-2Den-23annexG2&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8K75qGdDlOta4kh6k2F0jrT195M3tF3J_Fxcz6EvuG2kYKDeA67ZTEnthHXAPVXH&m=zQO9aagKp2dC89HXD1GhTs9r2VIqmHL9NqxJae3HGUI&s=VsAM1vuRBUpiU0v-rPzKnfiK1yhzAz3k0ApLW5xkKFQ&e=> of
> > the ICANN Bylaws as well as Specification 1 Section 1.3.4
> > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__newgtlds.icann.org_sites_default_files_agreements_agreement-2Dapproved-2D31jul17-2Den.html-23specification1.1&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8K75qGdDlOta4kh6k2F0jrT195M3tF3J_Fxcz6EvuG2kYKDeA67ZTEnthHXAPVXH&m=zQO9aagKp2dC89HXD1GhTs9r2VIqmHL9NqxJae3HGUI&s=OFNAyhbPchPz3vLH_5Nlie6t8VSem9yv6p8XWwVvHIo&e=> of
> > the Base Registry Agreement and the Consensus Policies and Temporary
> > Policies Specification
> > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_pages_approved-2Dwith-2Dspecs-2D2013-2D09-2D17-2Den-23consensus-2Dtemporary&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8K75qGdDlOta4kh6k2F0jrT195M3tF3J_Fxcz6EvuG2kYKDeA67ZTEnthHXAPVXH&m=zQO9aagKp2dC89HXD1GhTs9r2VIqmHL9NqxJae3HGUI&s=E1iSnuew0fltRyCuFeS3cjQ0YcTLkf-ae_lyOwbqXIc&e=> of
> > the Registrar Accreditation Agreement, which provide that: “maintenance
> > of andaccess to accurate and up-to-date information concerning domain
> > name registrations” is one of the topics on which ICANN may enforce
> > consensus policies.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Marika, Berry and Caitlin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> > Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
>
More information about the Gnso-epdp-team
mailing list