[Gnso-epdp-team] Draft Initial Report

Tue Dec 3 14:51:44 UTC 2019

Hi Janis,

when explained like that, it actually makes sense. As far as a fallback 
position goes, it is not something I would rule out.

Best,

Volker

Am 03.12.2019 um 15:09 schrieb Janis Karklins:
> Dear All,
>
> Let me explain thinking behind the "Decentralized" model.
> It has been mentioned during the Team conversation that "status quo 
> improved" can not be ruled out. Today there isn't system but 
> decentralized mechanism of sending request for private registration 
> information disclosure. Sometimes these requests are answered, 
> sometimes remain without reply.
> Improvements in the current mechanism could be done through 
> standardization of procedures that would be applied by both - 
> requesting entities and responding entities without changing the 
> decentralized nature of mechanism.
> If processes that would be applied in "Status Quo improved" will be 
> standardized, then this mechanism could be qualified as "Standardized 
> System of Access/Disclosure (SSAD)".
> I acknowledge that the Team has agreed on "centralized gateway 
> approach" and works on this assumption. But as a theoretical model 
> "decentralized - status Quo improved" has a justification to exist 
> within defined parameters of our task.
>
> I do not insist on retaining of this option in the initial report, but 
> just wanted to explain the reason behind putting the option in the draft.
>
> JK
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:46 PM Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu 
> <mailto:milton at gatech.edu>> wrote:
>
>     That’s the correct way to put it, Volker. No consensus, no SSAD.
>     Perhaps the draft report can be modified to indicate that.
>
>     --MM
>
>     *From:*Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org>> *On Behalf Of *Volker
>     Greimann
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, December 3, 2019 7:38 AM
>     *To:* gnso-epdp-team at icann.org <mailto:gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
>     *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Draft Initial Report
>
>     Ultimately, the "no-SSAD" "option" describes the status quo. In
>     other words, if we as a group fail to reach consensus this is what
>     we'll have, regardless of what we want. Maybe this can serve as
>     encouragement to move away from extreme positions that have a
>     rabbits chance in a snake pit to survive a consensus call...
>
>     Volker
>
>     Am 03.12.2019 um 13:26 schrieb Mueller, Milton L:
>
>         Ha, you spoiled the agreement, Brian. ;-)
>
>         >If I can go so far, I suggest that the initial report indicate
>         that we are
>
>         > working primarily toward the “centralized” model pending
>         crucial input from the DPB.
>
>         This is not our understanding at all. One reason I want to
>         eliminate the “no SSAD” option is that I think it confuses the
>         issue of centralizing requests, which can be done and can gain
>         consensus, versus centralizing the decision maker, which I
>         think is deeply problematic and will never gain consensus.
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
>
>         Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org  <mailto:Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
>
>         https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
>     -- 
>     Volker A. Greimann
>     General Counsel and Policy Manager
>     *KEY-SYSTEMS GMBH*
>
>     T: +49 6894 9396901
>     M: +49 6894 9396851
>     F: +49 6894 9396851
>     W: www.key-systems.net <http://www.key-systems.net>
>
>     Key-Systems GmbH is a company registered at the local court of
>     Saarbruecken, Germany with the registration no. HR B 18835
>     CEO: Alexander Siffrin
>
>     Part of the CentralNic Group PLC (LON: CNIC) a company registered
>     in England and Wales with company number 8576358.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
>     Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
>     _______________________________________________
>     By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
>     your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing
>     list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
>     (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
>     Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the
>     Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>     configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style
>     delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation),
>     and so on.
>
-- 
Volker A. Greimann
General Counsel and Policy Manager
*KEY-SYSTEMS GMBH*

T: +49 6894 9396901
M: +49 6894 9396851
F: +49 6894 9396851
W: www.key-systems.net

Key-Systems GmbH is a company registered at the local court of 
Saarbruecken, Germany with the registration no. HR B 18835
CEO: Alexander Siffrin

Part of the CentralNic Group PLC (LON: CNIC) a company registered in 
England and Wales with company number 8576358.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20191203/b3e445e0/attachment.html>