[Gnso-epdp-team] Draft Initial Report

Jennifer Gore Jennifer at winterfeldt.law
Tue Dec 3 22:56:54 UTC 2019

Hello All,

In my opinion, the Registrar is the worst party to be the decision maker of the data subject due to the blatant conflict of interest. The registrant will have already entered into a legal relationship with the registrar under the registrant (end user) agreement along with it being in the best interests of the registrar to not terminate the relationship with the registrant.  Therefore, I hope Milton is not saying that he will hold up consensus even if the DPAs do support the isolation of centralized decision making within ICANN Org.

Best regards,


Jennifer Gore
Internet Governance
Winterfeldt IP Group
1200 17<x-apple-data-detectors://12/1>th<x-apple-data-detectors://12/1> St NW<x-apple-data-detectors://12/1>, Ste 501<x-apple-data-detectors://12/1>
Washington, DC  20036<x-apple-data-detectors://12/1>
jennifer at winterfeldt.law<mailto:jennifer at winterfeldt.law>
+1 202 340 9631

From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mueller, Milton L
Sent: Tuesday, December 3, 2019 1:29 PM
To: King, Brian <Brian.King at markmonitor.com>; gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Draft Initial Report

From: King, Brian <Brian.King at markmonitor.com<mailto:Brian.King at markmonitor.com>>
>Are you saying that even if the DPB writes to the Strawberries and says
>“yes, it’s possible to isolate liability for decision-making centrally with
>ICANN Org”, it would still be impossible for us to come to consensus on
>the centralized decision-making model? (ignoring how (un)likely we think
>that response is)

Yes, indeed. That is what I am saying. This is one reason we are not so pleased with all this kerfuffle about the EDPB. You’re putting the cart before the horse.

What matters is not whether it is legally _possible_ for ICANN to magically absorb the legal responsibility of the registrars for releasing the data of their customers; what matters is whether that is _desirable_ from a policy standpoint. Legal advice or “guidance” from the EDPB has no bearing on what is the right policy, it only clarifies whether one of the policy options is feasible.

We want the disclosure decision to be made as close as possible to the party who is directly accountable to the registrant, the data subject, and that’s the registrar. We believe that the legitimate interests of data requestors are served by standardizing the process, and centralizing and facilitating requests, but centralizing disclosure is going to make it into an automated rubber stamp, as I suspect you have already figured out.

Dr. Milton L Mueller
School of Public Policy
Georgia Institute of Technology
[IGP_logo_gold block_email sig]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20191203/4484e4b9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11124 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20191203/4484e4b9/image001-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2988 bytes
Desc: image004.jpg
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20191203/4484e4b9/image004-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5910 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20191203/4484e4b9/image002-0001.png>

More information about the Gnso-epdp-team mailing list