[Gnso-epdp-team] Proposed Agenda - EPDP Team Meeting #41

[Caitlin Tubergen]

Dear EPDP Team,

 

Please find the proposed agenda for the next EPDP Team meeting below. If any EPDP Team Members believe topics based on ICANN org questions need to be added to the discussion, please let us know. The previously-circulated email re: ICANN org questions as well as a summary guide re: the questions identified in the agenda have been attached for your reference. 

 

Best regards,

 

Marika, Berry, and Caitlin

 

EPDP Meeting #41 Agenda

Thursday, 31 January 2019

 
Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes)
 
Welcome and Updates from EPDP Team Chair (5 minutes)
 
Reminder: process for email discussions and upcoming deadlines
Review of outstanding action items
Other updates, if applicable
 
Continue review of public comments on Initial Report and/or revised recommendations
 
Recommendation 11 – Data retention (20 minutes)
Review small team updates and input provided (see PCRT at https://community.icann.org/x/U4cWBg and small team recommendations). Review input provided (RySG, RrSG, GAC) (5 minutes)
Confirmation of agreement reached or next steps to come to agreement (5 minutes)
Implementation Transition Period (30 minutes)
The GNSO Council Leadership has requested the team further discuss next steps regarding implementation transition period and notes it may be helpful to include a recommendation in the Final Report.
ICANN Org Questions
ICANN Org Liaisons to introduce questions for discussion
RDAP and SLAs – what recommendations and/or guidance needs to be included in the Final Report, or is this to be addressed during implementation? 
RDDS Search Capabilities - should the requirements in the Temp Spec be confirmed by the EPDP Team in the Final Report or is this to be further considered in phase 2?
Bulk data registration access to ICANN – should the requirements in the Temp Spec be confirmed by the EPDP Team in the Final Report?
Process for amendments to Registry – Registrar agreements – should the process in the Temp Spec be confirmed as a policy recommendation, or is this to be addressed during implementation?
Does the ‘consent’ provision in the Temporary Specification require confirmation in the Final Report or is this to be addressed during implementation as consent is already defined in the GDPR?
Notices to Registered Name Holders Regarding Data Processing - is this required to be addressed in the Final Report or is this part of implementation or in direct consultation with registrars?
Confirmation of agreement reached or next steps to come to agreement 
 
Wrap and confirm next meeting to be scheduled for Tuesday, 5 February 2019 at 14.00 UTC (5 minutes)
Confirm action items
Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any
 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20190130/26ffabc1/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] ICANN Org Questions - draft assessment and topics for further discussion
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:07:40 +0000
Size: 481197
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20190130/26ffabc1/attachment-0001.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ICANN Org Qs for discussion - 30 Jan 2019 (1).docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 23304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20190130/26ffabc1/ICANNOrgQsfordiscussion-30Jan20191-0001.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4621 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20190130/26ffabc1/smime-0001.p7s>