[Gnso-epdp-team] About the "Issues sheet"

[King, Brian]

Hi all,

I think I agree with Milton’s second point. If we’re finalizing the Initial Report on Thursday (hooray!), we shouldn’t get bogged down with a substantive discussion on the various automatable use cases. It seems that conversation won’t yet lead to harmonious consensus.

As a procedural matter, we should include in the Initial Report the various use cases we are considering automating, and to be fair “or not automating.” I believe Mark Sv is sending an updated version of this around shortly. I’m not the expert on GNSO procedures that some of our colleagues are, but I think it may be required to list these in the Initial Report and seek public comment even if we end up rejecting them. We could not, on the other hand, NOT list them and then publish a final report that includes them without first publishing an initial report that includes them. Right?

Thanks!

Brian J. King
Director of Internet Policy and Industry Affairs

T +1 443 761 3726
markmonitor.com<http://www.markmonitor.com>

MarkMonitor
Protecting companies and consumers in a digital world

From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Mueller, Milton L
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 4:31 PM
To: Janis Karklins <karklinsj at gmail.com>; Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>
Cc: gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] About the "Issues sheet"

Two responses:

  1.  There are many things that you may think were “agreements in LA” that were not agreements but agreements to disagree
  2.  If we are merely finalizing the initial report then the current debate about which uses cases can be automated is out of bounds Thursday.

MM

From: Janis Karklins <karklinsj at gmail.com<mailto:karklinsj at gmail.com>>
Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 3:42 PM
To: Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org<mailto:caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>>
Cc: Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu<mailto:milton at gatech.edu>>; gnso-epdp-team at icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] About the "Issues sheet"

Dear Team members,

Pls approach this exercise as a proof reading of the Initial Report rather than attempt to re-open agreements of LA. In remaining few hours we will not be able to re-negotiate sometimes delicate compromises that we coined during hours and hours of collective and small groups conversations.
Another thing is to engage in discussions of real cases for possible automated disclosure that we didn't have a chance to discuss in details in LA. Hope that current debate is contributing to a solution that we can endorse on Thursday.
Thank you for understanding
JK

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:12 PM Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org<mailto:caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>> wrote:
Milton and Team:

The agenda message had three attachments:

1. an issues list, where groups may populate items within the report that they cannot live with,
2. a red-lined word doc that does not contain line numbers, but shows the updates made as a result of agreements reached during the F2F, and
3. a clean PDF with line numbers.

You may view the line numbers via the PDF.

Thank you.

Best regards,

Marika, Berry, and Caitlin


From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of "Mueller, Milton L" <milton at gatech.edu<mailto:milton at gatech.edu>>
Date: Monday, February 3, 2020 at 11:49 AM
To: "gnso-epdp-team at icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>" <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>>
Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] About the "Issues sheet"

Caitlin,
The issues sheet asks for “line numbers” to help specify where the text we are concerned about is. However, in the Word document with the draft report, I do not see any line numbers.
Am I looking at the wrong thing? Should I see them on the draft, or should I use other indicators, such as section X.Y, bullet point 3, line 2, for example?

Dr. Milton L Mueller
School of Public Policy
Georgia Institute of Technology

_______________________________________________
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Depdp-2Dteam&d=DwMGaQ&c=OGmtg_3SI10Cogwk-ShFiw&r=qQNCXqU_XE2XIdXbawYmk-YDflYH6pd8ffXlzxU37OA&m=YFLv9gq9F4iGKYuUzo-UrKr9FLYS2z81zVaSRKgJRF0&s=vlI-emZ18dfqx1wnRr9ZenihXZnWnctZD1Kw95LfvsU&e=>
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_policy&d=DwMGaQ&c=OGmtg_3SI10Cogwk-ShFiw&r=qQNCXqU_XE2XIdXbawYmk-YDflYH6pd8ffXlzxU37OA&m=YFLv9gq9F4iGKYuUzo-UrKr9FLYS2z81zVaSRKgJRF0&s=3rmuJw-q4AX5udGV-bHTMOKoW2Tv3v6JudfTyJtYUaI&e=>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_privacy_tos&d=DwMGaQ&c=OGmtg_3SI10Cogwk-ShFiw&r=qQNCXqU_XE2XIdXbawYmk-YDflYH6pd8ffXlzxU37OA&m=YFLv9gq9F4iGKYuUzo-UrKr9FLYS2z81zVaSRKgJRF0&s=iaxcv2JqvOZZcQez2OZE0K-wntSMAhxcV4ZwVi6j4_A&e=>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20200203/accd4e40/attachment-0001.html>