[Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - proposal for an SSAD Hybrid able to evolve to a Centralized and Automated Model + agenda for Thursday's meeting
Janis Karklins
karklinsj at gmail.com
Wed Jan 22 21:57:18 UTC 2020
Volker,
Thank you for your feedback.
I would like to explain thinking behind the Steering Committee proposal. It
is nothing but common sense idea. If you have a transitional process, it
should be somehow managed. A steering committee is the most common way of
overseeing and handling such transitional process.
Leadership and staff analyzed discussion on CPH hybrid model and came
forward with a description to stimulate further discussion of the Team. If
idea will fly it will turn into a Team proposal. If not, Team should come
up with a different idea.
As per modalities of the potential Steering Committee, it will be discussed
in depth. The current proposal is drawn from an existing Steering group
within one of ICANN processes.
Look forward to Team's discussion tomorrow
JK
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:47 AM Volker Greimann <vgreimann at key-systems.net>
wrote:
> Hello Marika,
>
> thank you for the new proposal. I note that there is a new proposal
> included, which is the recommendation of the formation of a steering
> committee. Where did this come from? If it rises to the level of a proposed
> recommendation in the draft, it should have originated from the community
> and seen some consensus amongst our groups, but I recall no such
> discussion.
>
> I appreciate the apparent desire for something other than a full-fledged
> PDP to make modifications as time goes by and we learn more about the SSAD
> and its potential flaws, but I have my doubts that the community has
> sufficient resources in all groups to staff such a body (It sounds a bit
> like being condemned to "EPDP for life").
>
> The proposed make-up also seems unbalanced as the 4 CPH members could be
> outvoted by the 5 non-contracted members, and At-Large and NCSG share one
> seat (I have my doubts that this could lead to anything but a stalemate for
> that seat). As a majority is sufficient to send any proposal to the GNSO
> council (even though it requires a supermajority), this could be
> problematic.
>
> With regard to Rec 15: Logging, I porpose to clarify that logging should
> not extend to any personal data disclosed through the system as part of any
> disclosure decision as that would open up another can of privacy worms.
>
> Rec: 14: I Don't think the "must" in the first paragraph had consensus, or
> am I mistaken. "should" and "may" are fine, especially since it may not be
> known whether automation is legally permissible in any specific case unless
> it leaves the realm of automation and enters the realm of someone looking
> at the request and making the relevant determination. I am all for
> automating that which can be automated but ultimately that must be
> determined by the disclosing parties.
>
> Rec 12: Suggestion: Could we add something to the effect that requestors
> must/should state in their request for how long they will / expect to
> retain the data? Also, requestors must always state in their request that
> in case they intend to share the data with third parties, who those third
> parties are and what their purposes are.
>
> Best,
>
> Volker
>
> Am 21.01.2020 um 15:43 schrieb Marika Konings:
>
> Dear EPDP Team,
>
>
>
> Please find below the proposed agenda for the next EPDP Team meeting which
> is scheduled for Thursday 23 January at 14.00 UTC.
>
>
>
> Also, you will find attached the proposal for an SSAD Hybrid able to
> evolve to a Centralized and Automated Model. Please consider this proposal
> with your respective group and come prepared to Thursday’s meeting to share
> your groups feedback – this will be crucial to prepare for a productive F2F
> meeting. Do note that updates to the preliminary recommendations in the
> proposal only relate to changes that would bring the preliminary
> recommendations in line with the proposal described in the document – other
> comments and/or highlights have been removed for ease of reading and will
> be considered after the group’s review of the proposal.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Caitlin, Berry and Marika
>
>
>
>
>
> *EPDP Phase 2 - Meeting #41*
>
> *Proposed Agenda*
>
> Thursday, 23 January 2020 at 14.00 UTC
>
>
>
> 1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes)
>
>
>
> 2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair)
>
>
>
> 3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5
> minutes)
>
> a) Update from the legal committee
>
> b) ICANN follow up on Belgian DPA response to
> Strawberry letter – see questions suggested by Marc Anderson:
>
> · Is ICANN expecting an additional communication on the Strawberry
> letter?
>
> · Would ICANN org like feedback from the EPDP Team before it meets
> with the Belgian DPA?
>
>
>
> 4. Introduction of Proposal for an SSAD Hybrid able to evolve to a
> Centralized and Automated Model (“The Chameleon”)
>
> a) Staff overview
>
> b) EPDP Team reactions
>
> c) Confirm next steps
>
>
>
> 5. Plans for F2F meeting in Los Angeles
>
> a) Leadership Priorities
>
> b) EPDP Team input
>
> c) Confirmation of expected homework / preparations
> by EPDP Team for the LA F2F meeting
>
> d) Confirm next steps
>
>
>
> 6. Continue review of issues list (those items
> not dependent on item #4), if time allows
>
> a) See highlighted items on the issue list (to be
> circulated)
>
> b) EPDP Team input
>
> c) Confirm next steps
>
>
>
> 7. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting (5
> minutes):
>
> a) Monday 27 January 2020 at 9.00 local time at the
> ICANN office
>
> b) Confirm action items
>
> c) Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing listGnso-epdp-team at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
> --
> Volker A. Greimann
> General Counsel and Policy Manager
> *KEY-SYSTEMS GMBH*
>
> T: +49 6894 9396901
> M: +49 6894 9396851
> F: +49 6894 9396851
> W: www.key-systems.net
>
> Key-Systems GmbH is a company registered at the local court of
> Saarbruecken, Germany with the registration no. HR B 18835
> CEO: Alexander Siffrin
>
> Part of the CentralNic Group PLC (LON: CNIC) a company registered in
> England and Wales with company number 8576358.
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20200122/44e46ee5/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gnso-epdp-team
mailing list