[Gnso-epdp-team] IPC/BC/RySG and others: requesting an extension on can't live with items

[Alan Greenberg]

I too STRONGLY support this request. 

Alan

On July 10, 2020 9:28:10 AM EDT, "Anderson, Marc via Gnso-epdp-team" <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org> wrote:
>I support Brian’s request.  Given the importance and complexity of our
>work it is important that we take the time to get it right.  Our task
>is not just to identify can’t live with items and issues with a report
>that has gone through some fairly significant edits, but also to
>propose solutions to those can’t live with items.  If we are to be
>successful this will require internal discussion, but also time to
>caucus across groups.
>
>
>
>Best,
>
>Marc
>
>
>
>
>
>From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of
>King, Brian via Gnso-epdp-team
>Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 9:06 AM
>To: EPDP <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
>Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-epdp-team] IPC/BC/RySG and others: requesting
>an extension on can't live with items
>
>
>
>Hello EPDP Staff and Leadership,
>
>
>
>On behalf of the IPC/BC/RySG and other groups who I know feel similarly
>but with whom we have not yet been able to caucus officially:
>
>
>
>We have been diligently working through the report during this silent
>week, and many of us have found it quite challenging to provide
>thoughtful and constructive comments on each recommendation in this
>short a timeframe. While we work recommendation-by-recommendation, many
>of us are also grappling with the report as a whole, and we need time
>to confer within our constituencies to understand which are our most
>pressing “can’t live with” items, and to come up with creative
>solutions if needed to come to consensus.
>
>
>
>We note that many of our most challenging and contentious issues were
>the ones discussed most recently. Taking just five or so days to review
>new language on our most important issues with our constituencies has
>proven to be quite challenging, if not impossible. Frankly, it would
>not do justice to all the hard work we have put in to get this far if
>we rush through the most important parts, particularly if consensus
>will depend on more thoughtful review and constructive conversation.
>
>
>
>In light of the difficulty to accomplish substantive review and
>discussion in the requested timeframe, and with the goal of achieving
>consensus in Phase 2, we would like to request an additional two weeks
>to work through our “can’t live with” items. If granted, we can commit
>to providing thoughtful, constructive suggestions on any remaining
>items by COB on Friday, July 24.
>
>
>
>Thank you for your consideration.
>
>
>
>Brian J. King​
>Director of Internet Policy and Industry Affairs, IP Group
>
>
>T +1 443 761 3726​
>
>clarivate.com​
>
>
>
>
>
>Confidentiality note: This e-mail may contain confidential information
>from Clarivate. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that
>any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
>e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
>error, please delete this e-mail and notify the sender immediately.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20200710/8c3d5698/attachment.html>