[GNSO-GGP-WG] RESULTS-CONSENSUS CALL: GGP Guidance Recommendation Final Report

[Tom Barrett]

well done!

On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 10:39 AM Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
wrote:

> Dear Working Group members,
>
>
>
> As noted below, the Consensus Call was closed as of COB, Thursday, 07
> December.
>
>
>
> *Results:* As no objections were received, *all nine (9) Guidance
> Recommendations are considered to be agreed by the Working Group with Full
> Consensus*, as in Annex C in the attached final version of the document.
> Please also note that no edits were received by Working Group members
> during the review period.
>
>
>
> The final step in the process is for Paul McGrady, as GNSO Council Liaison
> to the GGP, to submit the Final Report with a motion to the GNSO Council by
> Monday, 11 December, the document and motion deadline for consideration by
> the GNSO Council at its meeting on Thursday, 21 December.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Steve & Julie
>
>
>
> *From: *GNSO-GGP-WG <gnso-ggp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie
> Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, December 7, 2023 at 4:49 PM
> *To: *"gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[GNSO-GGP-WG] REMINDER FINAL-FOR REVIEW & CONSENSUS CALL: GGP
> Guidance Recommendations Final Report
>
>
>
> Dear Working Group members,
>
>
>
> Reminder that per the request below, by COB TODAY please indicate your
> group’s position on the CONSENSUS DESIGNATIONS in ANNEX C of the attached
> Final Report.  If we do not hear from you we will assume your group is in
> agreement with the designations.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Julie
>
>
>
> *From: *GNSO-GGP-WG <gnso-ggp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie
> Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
> *Date: *Tuesday, December 5, 2023 at 10:42 AM
> *To: *"gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[GNSO-GGP-WG] FINAL-FOR REVIEW & CONSENSUS CALL: GGP Guidance
> Recommendations Final Report
>
>
>
> Dear Working Group members,
>
>
>
> *Thank you again for all your work on this very important effort.*
>
>
>
> Per the discussion on yesterday’s call, Monday, 04 December 2023, the
> working group agreed to one minor change in the attached Final Draft of the
> Final Report: to include in Guidance Recommendation 1 to clarify the
> meaning of “under-served” in the Implementation Guidance, page 9, to
> include a footnote from the Initial Report deliberations referencing the
> GAC definition as follows: “The working group agreed to cite from the
> Initial Report the GAC's definition of under-served: https://gac.icann.org/working-group/gac-working-group-on-underserved-regions-usrwg
> [gac.icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gac.icann.org/working-group/gac-working-group-on-underserved-regions-usrwg__;!!PtGJab4!5333mm3P75BiFELEOxEZwalPHRJ_0BTwSv0a0CuQjQJmDNYoTmEL10dkfYbtYUvRQS614xrJaYvxinKzfqOVcHpb5Vk1WWPs7w$>,
> specifically: “An under-served region is defined as one that: Does not have
> a well developed DNS and/or associated industry or economy…”” The working
> group also agreed to correct a couple of typographical errors.  Other than
> these very minor changes the working group agreed with the attached text as
> written.
>
>
>
> *REPORT REVIEW: Working Group members are requested to review, with their
> respective groups, Section 3 of the Final Report and provide suggested
> minor edits, if any, in redline/review mode not later than COB Thursday, 07
> December.*  Note that minor edits are welcome for the other sections of
> the report, although those sections are mostly unchanged from the Initial
> Report.
>
>
>
> *CONSENSUS CALL: **Working Group members are requested to review, with
> their respective groups, the Consensus Designations for each Guidance
> Recommendation listed in Annex C and to indicate on the Working Group list
> as soon as possible but not later than COB Thursday, 07 December if **their
> groups agree with the Consensus Designations, or if there are objections.* Per
> the GNSO Guidance Process Manual: “Each recommendation in the Final
> Report should be accompanied by the appropriate consensus level designation
> (see section 3.6 – Standard Methodology for Making Decisions in the GNSO
> Working Group Guidelines [gnso.icann.org]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-15mar23-en.pdf__;!!PtGJab4!8vaHrOCw8ftmRr2uI3_KyK_hY3zkpGtroJTW1PkXxeQl3FxtpO34kZNWkg0xWE0F9zI7OPRvb1EljqvWmqVb7JdJI66zHT5XUQ$>
> ).
>
>
>
> Thank you very much again for your consideration.  Following the
> completion of this process the Final Report will be submitted to the GNSO
> Council with a draft motion on Monday, 11 December – the document and
> motion deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Julie and Steve
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-GGP-WG mailing list
> GNSO-GGP-WG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ggp-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>


-- 
Propose a meeting: https://calendly.com/tbarrett-encirca
Thomas Barrett
President
EnCirca, Inc
+1.781.942.9975 (office)
400 W. Cummings Park, Suite 1725
Woburn, MA 01801 USA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ggp-wg/attachments/20231211/17e3112b/attachment.html>