[GNSO-GGP-WG] [Ext] Re: FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED TO COUNCIL: GGP Guidance Recommendation Final Report

[Julie Hedlund]

Thank you very much Lawrence!

Kind regards,
Steve & Julie

From: "Lawrence O. Olawale-Roberts" <lawrence at microboss.org>
Date: Monday, December 11, 2023 at 1:20 PM
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, "gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED TO COUNCIL: GGP Guidance Recommendation Final Report

Steve and Julie,

Many thanks for all the long hours of support and work by staff to get us all to this point, its very much appreciated.

LOR

________________________________
From: GNSO-GGP-WG <gnso-ggp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 10:53 AM
To: gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org <gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [GNSO-GGP-WG] FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED TO COUNCIL: GGP Guidance Recommendation Final Report


Dear Working Group members,



As noted below, Paul McGrady, as GNSO Council Liaison to the GGP, has submitted the Final Report with a motion to the GNSO Council today Monday, 11 December, the document and motion deadline for consideration by the GNSO Council at its meeting on Thursday, 21 December.



Thank you very much to Mike, Paul, and the GGP Working Group members for completing your part of this important work – congratulations!  We will let you know of the outcome of the Council’s consideration of the Final Report.



Kind regards,

Steve & Julie



From: GNSO-GGP-WG <gnso-ggp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Date: Friday, December 8, 2023 at 10:48 AM
To: "gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [GNSO-GGP-WG] RESULTS-CONSENSUS CALL: GGP Guidance Recommendation Final Report



Dear Working Group members,



As noted below, the Consensus Call was closed as of COB, Thursday, 07 December.



Results: As no objections were received, all nine (9) Guidance Recommendations are considered to be agreed by the Working Group with Full Consensus, as in Annex C in the attached final version of the document.  Please also note that no edits were received by Working Group members during the review period.



The final step in the process is for Paul McGrady, as GNSO Council Liaison to the GGP, to submit the Final Report with a motion to the GNSO Council by Monday, 11 December, the document and motion deadline for consideration by the GNSO Council at its meeting on Thursday, 21 December.



Kind regards,

Steve & Julie



From: GNSO-GGP-WG <gnso-ggp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Date: Thursday, December 7, 2023 at 4:49 PM
To: "gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [GNSO-GGP-WG] REMINDER FINAL-FOR REVIEW & CONSENSUS CALL: GGP Guidance Recommendations Final Report



Dear Working Group members,



Reminder that per the request below, by COB TODAY please indicate your group’s position on the CONSENSUS DESIGNATIONS in ANNEX C of the attached Final Report.  If we do not hear from you we will assume your group is in agreement with the designations.



Kind regards,

Julie



From: GNSO-GGP-WG <gnso-ggp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 at 10:42 AM
To: "gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [GNSO-GGP-WG] FINAL-FOR REVIEW & CONSENSUS CALL: GGP Guidance Recommendations Final Report



Dear Working Group members,



Thank you again for all your work on this very important effort.



Per the discussion on yesterday’s call, Monday, 04 December 2023, the working group agreed to one minor change in the attached Final Draft of the Final Report: to include in Guidance Recommendation 1 to clarify the meaning of “under-served” in the Implementation Guidance, page 9, to include a footnote from the Initial Report deliberations referencing the GAC definition as follows: “The working group agreed to cite from the Initial Report the GAC's definition of under-served: https://gac.icann.org/working-group/gac-working-group-on-underserved-regions-usrwg [gac.icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gac.icann.org/working-group/gac-working-group-on-underserved-regions-usrwg__;!!PtGJab4!5333mm3P75BiFELEOxEZwalPHRJ_0BTwSv0a0CuQjQJmDNYoTmEL10dkfYbtYUvRQS614xrJaYvxinKzfqOVcHpb5Vk1WWPs7w$>, specifically: “An under-served region is defined as one that: Does not have a well developed DNS and/or associated industry or economy…”” The working group also agreed to correct a couple of typographical errors.  Other than these very minor changes the working group agreed with the attached text as written.



REPORT REVIEW: Working Group members are requested to review, with their respective groups, Section 3 of the Final Report and provide suggested minor edits, if any, in redline/review mode not later than COB Thursday, 07 December.  Note that minor edits are welcome for the other sections of the report, although those sections are mostly unchanged from the Initial Report.



CONSENSUS CALL: Working Group members are requested to review, with their respective groups, the Consensus Designations for each Guidance Recommendation listed in Annex C and to indicate on the Working Group list as soon as possible but not later than COB Thursday, 07 December if their groups agree with the Consensus Designations, or if there are objections. Per the GNSO Guidance Process Manual: “Each recommendation in the Final Report should be accompanied by the appropriate consensus level designation (see section 3.6 – Standard Methodology for Making Decisions in the GNSO Working Group Guidelines [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-15mar23-en.pdf__;!!PtGJab4!8vaHrOCw8ftmRr2uI3_KyK_hY3zkpGtroJTW1PkXxeQl3FxtpO34kZNWkg0xWE0F9zI7OPRvb1EljqvWmqVb7JdJI66zHT5XUQ$>).



Thank you very much again for your consideration.  Following the completion of this process the Final Report will be submitted to the GNSO Council with a draft motion on Monday, 11 December – the document and motion deadline.



Kind regards,

Julie and Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ggp-wg/attachments/20231211/d5dbb864/attachment-0001.html>