[GNSO-GGP-WG] CPWG comments following GGP report

[Maureen Hilyard]

Hi all

Some comments from today's At-Large CPWG discussion to add to last week's
notes...

* Important to ensure that there is no conflict of interest with regard to
Pro Bono assistance - some sort of check must be applied
* Pro Bono input must come with reassurance that there is some continuity
of service to ensure that applicant gets full value of the service -
perhaps continuity of service may be funded by ASP
* During last round applicants had to find the information about any
services for themselves. This time Org/Implementation Team needs to play a
more facilitative role in matchmaking (which could be considered a measure
of success)
* What is GGP's reaction to the "further reduction of fees" option for
supported applicants if they can't use ASP to cover costs of preparing
their applications or for legal fees?

Hope this is helpful
Maureen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ggp-wg/attachments/20230125/1cf9a6dc/attachment.html>