[GNSO-GGP-WG] HOMEWORK REMINDER re: Actions & Notes |GGP WG-Applicant Support Mtg at ICANN76 13 March 1315 EST

[Julie Hedlund]

Dear Working Group members,

As a reminder, please see below the homework from the GGP WG meeting last Monday, 13 March.  Note also that the next meeting will be on Monday, 27 March at 2000 UTC.

Kind regards,
Steve and Julie

ACTION ITEMS/HOMEWORK:

TASKS 3, 4, and 5:  WG members are encouraged to comment on the Draft Working Document at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15CHHQlXfGONxJe0F66OeO2lEdLJMTtuQUMvHXvUlYEs/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/15CHHQlXfGONxJe0F66OeO2lEdLJMTtuQUMvHXvUlYEs/edit?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!4EODPHvBo-cmT17E3Y_Vrg_CmYvh7OzwN17mTYF5h222217ihWKjTcYhsscmKDEA9TvpHN3HAOekuim0wKIEBXGgWmZm1N8XVQ$>


From: GNSO-GGP-WG <gnso-ggp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Date: Monday, March 13, 2023 at 4:39 PM
To: "gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [GNSO-GGP-WG] Actions & Notes |GGP WG-Applicant Support Mtg at ICANN76 13 March 1315 EST

Dear Working Group members,

Please see below the action items and brief notes for today’s GGP WG meeting.  These also are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/GGPGIRFAS/2022+Meetings. Please note that these are not a substitute for the recordings also posted to the wiki.

The next meeting will be in two weeks on Monday, 27 March at 2000 UTC.

Kind regards,
Steve and Julie

ACTION ITEMS/HOMEWORK:

TASKS 3, 4, and 5:  WG members are encouraged to comment on the Draft Working Document at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15CHHQlXfGONxJe0F66OeO2lEdLJMTtuQUMvHXvUlYEs/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/15CHHQlXfGONxJe0F66OeO2lEdLJMTtuQUMvHXvUlYEs/edit?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!4EODPHvBo-cmT17E3Y_Vrg_CmYvh7OzwN17mTYF5h222217ihWKjTcYhsscmKDEA9TvpHN3HAOekuim0wKIEBXGgWmZm1N8XVQ$>

Notes:

Draft Agenda
GGP WG-Applicant Support Meeting at ICANN76
Monday, 1315 EST (local time Cancun)

1. Welcome and Introductions

2. Brief Overview of the GGP – see attached slides

3. Discussion of Guidance Recommendations Relating to Tasks 3, 4, 5 on Metrics

Life-cycle element #1 -- Outreach

  *   Include definitions for regions and broad language.   Yes, think an important point is struggling regions (across geographies - global South critically important but need to keep broad to target regions that might be struggling across ICANN's regions).  And also regions under-represented in the DNS market.
  *   Could use more formal language – such as from the UN.
  *   For info: SubPro Final Report mentions “struggling regions” in addition to “Global South” in its implementation guidance 17.6.
  *   We should not single out not-for-profit – should also include commercial enterprises.
  *   Commercial enterprises are excluded just not prioritized.
  *   Can target these enterprises in the overall outreach – perhaps not for applicant support.
  *   General comment – draw attention to “priority target of events” – only prioritized for outreach, not eligibility.
  *   Need to give ICANN org some guidance for priorities.  Discussing outreach – not talking about disqualifying anyone.
  *   Leave for regional experts to decide when they are defining the events.  But they will need guidelines.
  *   If we just measure events, we measure efforts not outcome – so need to use online tools and to gather as much information – even if to understand why someone did not apply.
  *   May want to collapse some of the details and check terminology (such as “portal”).
  *   A portal as a starting off point could be helpful.
  *   Regarding gaming, JAS WG acknowledged that is a possibility but I recall a comment at that time, that we can have  some expertise to determine that.
Life-cycle element #2 – Business Development

  *   Needs to be a strong outreach element with an additional element of support emphasizing underdeveloped regions and not-for-profits.
  *   How to track pro-bono assistance?   Could be done through a portal.  Could offer a match-making service.  Could gather feedback from both service providers and applicants.
  *   Look at services that were accessed rather than just available.  Also look at geographic spread (see previous section)l.
  *   QUESTION Will there be metrics applicable to ICANN's outreach efforts to qualified potential pro bono service providers?  Matchmaking services might depend on this, i.e. not just how many providers are there but how were they recruited by ICANN?  Or are we saying ICANN cannot conduct this type of outreach? QUESTION – relates to whether there are metrics in this regard – not sure what was done last time.
  *   Regarding the number of service providers we can have as baseline the number present in previous round.
Life-cycle element #3 – Ensure resources for success of the program

  *   Welcome input and language could use refinement.
  *   What number constitutes success?
  *   Need to launch it timely and also outreach must be timely.
4. Begin Discussion of Task 6 on Financial Support (time permitting) – Not discussed in this meeting

5. AOB

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ggp-wg/attachments/20230320/3d1be311/attachment-0001.html>