[Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Agenda and documents for WG meeting on Wednesday 4 March

[George Kirikos]

Hi folks,

Looking at the URS/UDRP comparison chart provided by Jim Bikoff, I
noticed that at least one section wasn't entirely correct, namely the
"Response Length Limit". For the UDRP column, it says "No Express
Length Limit.  See Art. 5." however the supplemental rules set by each
UDRP provider do set limits.

For example, at WIPO, that limit is 5000 words (see section 10):

http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/rules/supplemental/#10

At NAF, the limit is 15 pages (see 5(a)):

http://domains.adrforum.com/users/icann/resources/UDRP%20Supplemental%20Rules%20eff%20July%201%202010%20(final).pdf

Also, under the "Appeals and Other Proceedings" section, one can
submit the dispute to a court of competent jurisdiction *during* the
UDRP dispute itself (not just before or after). See, for example,
SDT.com:

http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2014-1870

or DUNLOP.com:

http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2009/d2009-0367.html

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/



On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org> wrote:
> Dear WG members,
>
> We hope the short break from our WG following the face-to-face facilitated
> meeting in Singapore last month has been refreshing and useful. Thank you
> again to all who were able to attend that meeting, whether in person or
> remotely, and for filling out the survey at the end!
>
> Here is the proposed agenda for the WG call scheduled for Wednesday 4 March
> at the usual time:
>
> Roll call/updates to SOI
> Update on research on sovereign immunity (WG Chairs/staff)
> Discussion of differences between the UDRP and URS (All)
> Next steps/next meeting
>
> You will note that the agenda follows up on the 13 February face-to-face
> discussions, such that pending receipt of input from international law
> experts we will be continuing with the next step of our Work Plan, in agenda
> item #3. For this discussion, please refer to the comparison chart first
> prepared by Jim Bikoff for Sub-Group A, available on the WG wiki at:
> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/49354393/URS-UDRP%20Comparison%20Chart%20v2.doc?version=1&modificationDate=1417621822000&api=v2.
> The actual UDRP and associated Rules can be found here:
> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/udrp-2012-02-25-en?routing_type=path;
> and the URS procedure and rules can be found, respectively, at:
> http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/urs/procedure-01mar13-en.pdf and
> http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/urs/rules-28jun13-en.pdf.
>
> As a further follow up to our 13 February meeting, staff has updated the
> draft paragraphs from the UDRP that the WG discussed several weeks ago
> concerning possible language that could cover the issue of standing, with
> reference to the legal protections for IGOs contained in Article 6ter of the
> Paris Convention. We attach the relevant updated language here for your
> review and subsequent WG discussion.
>
> Thanks and cheers
> Mary
>
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp