[gnso-igo-wt] Updated Recommendation #3

[BECKHAM Brian]

Thanks Berry, Staff,

After some initial discussion, from IGOs perspective, we think this could work (we are still engaged in some broader IGO consultations however).

We are keen to hear if others share that view, or if there may any specific aspect that others find still merits adjustment and/or discussion.  And if so, in the hopes we could still consult internally before Monday’s call, what those may be.

Brian

From: gnso-igo-wt <gnso-igo-wt-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Berry Cobb via gnso-igo-wt
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2022 6:58 PM
To: Berry Cobb via gnso-igo-wt <gnso-igo-wt at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-igo-wt] Updated Recommendation #3

Dear EPDP,

Please find attached a revised draft of Recommendation #3. This will be 2nd on our agenda after we do a pass of the other comments submitted for the Initial Report.

Staff tried to keep changes minimal and the text straightforward while addressing what we understood to be the concerns and requests that various EPDP team members voiced on the last call. We’ve also included brief explanatory text to add further context to the recommendation.

Thank you.

B


Berry Cobb
Policy Development - Portfolio Manager
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
berry.cobb at icann.org<mailto:berry.cobb at icann.org>



World Intellectual Property Organization Disclaimer: This electronic message may contain privileged, confidential and copyright protected information. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail and all its attachments. Please ensure all e-mail attachments are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-wt/attachments/20220211/c170130e/attachment.html>