[gnso-igo-wt] EPDP Final Report - Round 2 - Non-Substantive Edits

[Berry Cobb]

Dear EPDP,

One small update from the report sent out yesterday.

The leadership team received input from the RrSG regarding Proxy registrations and Recommendation #5 on Applicable law. You will see bracketed text on lines 390-392. Staff in consultation with EPDP leadership, it is proposed to amend that bracketed text as follows (bold text):

Arbitration will be conducted in accordance with the law as mutually agreed by the parties. Where the parties cannot reach mutual agreement, the IGO Complainant shall elect either the law of the relevant registrar’s principal office or the domain name holder's address as shown for the registration of the disputed domain name in the relevant registrar's Whois database at the time the complaint was submitted to the UDRP or URS provider. Where the parties cannot reach mutual agreement in a case where the registered domain name holder is a proxy service and the underlying registrant’s identity is disclosed as part of the UDRP or URS proceeding, the IGO Complainant shall elect either the law of the relevant registrar’s principal office the law in the location of the underlying registrant. In all cases, where neither law provides for a suitable cause of action, the arbitral tribunal shall make a determination as to the law to be applied in accordance with the applicable arbitral rules.

The rationale for the change is that it does seem appropriate in those cases where the beneficial registrant’s identity is disclosed as part of the UDRP or URS process to point to that registrant’s location instead of the proxy service’s (as the Registered Name Holder).

If no objections, staff will include this in the next version of the report and we can review during next week’s call.

Thank you.

Mary, Steve, and B

Berry Cobb
Policy Development – Senior Program Manager
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Mobile: +1 424 443 8960
Phone: +1 202 570 7240
Fax: +1 202 789 0104
Twitter: @berrycobb
www.icann.org<https://www.icann.org/>


From: gnso-igo-wt <gnso-igo-wt-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Berry Cobb via gnso-igo-wt <gnso-igo-wt at icann.org>
Reply-To: Berry Cobb <Berry.Cobb at icann.org>
Date: Monday, March 21, 2022 at 20:45
To: Chris Disspain via gnso-igo-wt <gnso-igo-wt at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-igo-wt] EPDP Final Report - Round 2 - Non-Substantive Edits

Dear EPDP,

Please find attached a line-numbered version of the lastest draft Final Report. As noted on the call today and in parallel to the final phase of the consensus process, we are beginning round #2 of non-substantive edit proposals to the report. Instructions and a link to the submission table are below.

Please have any suggested revisions posted by 23:59 UTC, 24 March 2022. Staff will import the proposals and return an updated version by the next day the 25th to make ready for review at our next meeting on the 28th.

Link to Input Table: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TIvh5MKOl7t8Q2Yb_VTqPVlRMhiZS0o6YMZtwXDYvsI/edit [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1TIvh5MKOl7t8Q2Yb_VTqPVlRMhiZS0o6YMZtwXDYvsI/edit__;!!PtGJab4!q9lwWgdUEbc3Kupll5JS4z4eyEFlKUdkgb14OgtZN0jhLZ6oxd16wsJvKCOwB4gsc65tLus$>
*** If you do not have access, please request it. It will notify me and I will provide you with suggestion rights.
**** If you do not get access in a timely manner to the google doc, please follow the instructions below and send your suggested edits to the full email list as an alternative.


Instructions:

  1.  Please note your name and the group you represent in the “Group Submitting” column.
  2.  For the “Line Number(s)” column, denote the line numbers from the clean version of the PDF of the Final Report for which you want to suggest a revision. For sentences or paragraphs, it will be helpful to list the full range of line numbers.
  3.  In the last column, “Proposed Revision”, please add your suggested edit or correction that you feel enhances or makes more clear the intent of the recommendation or supporting text without changing the intent. It should not be necessary to quote the text from the report. In more complex proposals, a rationale statement should be included to help inform the EPDP on why the edit should be made.
  4.  See the example in the first row.
  5.  Round #2 Edits scope: FULL REPORT.
  6.  Link<https://community.icann.org/display/GNSOIWT/Final+Report> to revision history.

Please let us know if you have any questions or need clarifications.

Thank you.

Mary, Steve, and Berry

Berry Cobb
Policy Development – Senior Program Manager
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Mobile: +1 424 443 8960
Phone: +1 202 570 7240
Fax: +1 202 789 0104
Twitter: @berrycobb
www.icann.org<https://www.icann.org/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-wt/attachments/20220322/94c29e8a/attachment.html>