[gnso-irtpd] RE: TDRP stats

[Knight, Barbara]

Lars,
Thank you for sending along the spreadsheet. You are correct that the Transfers disputed won and the Transfers disputed lost numbers are the same because for each case, there is a "winning" registrar and a "losing registrar".  Likewise, the number of Transfers disputed nodecision cases should actually be divided by 2 as these numbers also would have two registrars that were parties to the case and neither prevailed.  Hope this helps to explain the numbers a bit.  Thank you.



Barbara Knight
Director of Registry Compliance
bknight at Verisign.com

m: 703-622-1071 t: 703-948-3343
12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190

VerisignInc.com<http://www.verisigninc.com/>


[Description: Verisign(tm)]



From: owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:01 AM
To: gnso-irtpd at icann.org
Subject: [gnso-irtpd] FW: TDRP stats

And just in case, you actually would like to see the promised spreadsheet ...
Apologies,
Lars


From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann at icann.org<mailto:lars.hoffmann at icann.org>>
Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 9:59 AM
To: "gnso-irtpd at icann.org<mailto:gnso-irtpd at icann.org>" <gnso-irtpd at icann.org<mailto:gnso-irtpd at icann.org>>
Subject: TDRP stats

Dear all,

In light of the Group's discussion on TDRP we have  been in touch with transfer dispute providers to provide us with data from the cases they receive. We will share this with the group as soon as we have received and collated the relevant information.

In addition, we gathered some Registry-related TDRP data that might be useful to the discussion, too. I have attached a spreadsheet containing one sheet on the TDRP per TLD and a second sheet with an overview of the total number of TDRPs per month - both data sets are for the period of October 2009 to March 2013.

You might notice that the numbers for 'lost' and 'won' TDRP are exactly the same each month. As this is too much of a coincidence, we assume that these represent the same case (as one party lost it and another won it) -  but maybe a working group member of the RySG might be able to clarify further.  Assuming that our assumption is correct the breakdown per TLD shows that:

of 227 total cases between October 2009 and March 2013

224 concerned .com (94.3%)
11 concerned .net (4.8%)
2 concerned .pro (0.9%)

For those of you interested, the data for these tables were sourced from the monthly Registry Reports filed with ICANN, see http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/reports

With best wishes from rainy Brussels,
Lars




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-irtpd/attachments/20130426/4e2342e3/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1593 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-irtpd/attachments/20130426/4e2342e3/image002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 3105 bytes
Desc: image004.gif
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-irtpd/attachments/20130426/4e2342e3/image004.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2186 bytes
Desc: image005.jpg
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-irtpd/attachments/20130426/4e2342e3/image005.jpg>