[gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats

[Lars Hoffmann]

Dear Barbara,

Thank you for the quick reply and useful information.
This means then that the total number of cases was 152 in the period between
October 2009 and March 2013.

Breaking down as follows:

.com = 142 (93.4%)
.net = 8 (5.3%)
.pro = 2 (1.3%)

Best wishes,
Lars





From:  <Knight>, Barbara Knight <BKnight at verisign.com>
Date:  Friday, April 26, 2013 15:23 PM
To:  Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann at icann.org>, "gnso-irtpd at icann.org"
<gnso-irtpd at icann.org>
Subject:  RE: TDRP stats

Lars,
Thank you for sending along the spreadsheet. You are correct that the
Transfers disputed won and the Transfers disputed lost numbers are the same
because for each case, there is a ³winning² registrar and a ³losing
registrar².  Likewise, the number of Transfers disputed nodecision cases
should actually be divided by 2 as these numbers also would have two
registrars that were parties to the case and neither prevailed.  Hope this
helps to explain the numbers a bit.  Thank you.
 

Barbara Knight
Director of Registry Compliance
bknight at Verisign.com

m: 703-622-1071 t: 703-948-3343
12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190

VerisignInc.com <http://www.verisigninc.com/>
 
 

From: owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org] On
Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:01 AM
To: gnso-irtpd at icann.org
Subject: [gnso-irtpd] FW: TDRP stats
 

And just in case, you actually would like to see the promised spreadsheet Š

Apologies,

Lars

 

 

From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann at icann.org>
Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 9:59 AM
To: "gnso-irtpd at icann.org" <gnso-irtpd at icann.org>
Subject: TDRP stats

 

Dear all,

 

In light of the Group's discussion on TDRP we have  been in touch with
transfer dispute providers to provide us with data from the cases they
receive. We will share this with the group as soon as we have received and
collated the relevant information.

 

In addition, we gathered some Registry-related TDRP data that might be
useful to the discussion, too. I have attached a spreadsheet containing one
sheet on the TDRP per TLD and a second sheet with an overview of the total
number of TDRPs per month ­ both data sets are for the period of October
2009 to March 2013.

 

You might notice that the numbers for 'lost' and 'won' TDRP are exactly the
same each month. As this is too much of a coincidence, we assume that these
represent the same case (as one party lost it and another won it) -  but
maybe a working group member of the RySG might be able to clarify further.
Assuming that our assumption is correct the breakdown per TLD shows that:

 

of 227 total cases between October 2009 and March 2013

 

224 concerned .com (94.3%)

11 concerned .net (4.8%)

2 concerned .pro (0.9%)

 

For those of you interested, the data for these tables were sourced from the
monthly Registry Reports filed with ICANN, see
http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/reports

 

With best wishes from rainy Brussels,

Lars

 

 

 

 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-irtpd/attachments/20130426/de91f7e4/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1593 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-irtpd/attachments/20130426/de91f7e4/image002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-irtpd/attachments/20130426/de91f7e4/image005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5040 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-irtpd/attachments/20130426/de91f7e4/smime.p7s>