[gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats

[Kevin Erdman]

Dear Lars,

Given Barbara’s explanation that the resolution of each dispute always has a winner and loser, is it possible to get statistics on how many transfers were reversed after the TDRP versus how many transfers that were not reversed?
____________________________
Kevin R Erdman
Reichel IP LLP
212 West 10th Street, Suite D-280
Indianapolis, IN 46202
voice 317.677.0689
fax 317.454.1349
skype kevimundo
web www.reichelip.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


From: Lars Hoffmann 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 10:56 AM
To: gnso-irtpd at icann.org 
Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats

Dear Barbara,

Thank you for the quick reply and useful information.
This means then that the total number of cases was 152 in the period between October 2009 and March 2013.

Breaking down as follows:

.com = 142 (93.4%)
.net = 8 (5.3%)
.pro = 2 (1.3%)

Best wishes,
Lars





From: <Knight>, Barbara Knight <BKnight at verisign.com>
Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 15:23 PM
To: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann at icann.org>, "gnso-irtpd at icann.org" <gnso-irtpd at icann.org>
Subject: RE: TDRP stats


Lars,

Thank you for sending along the spreadsheet. You are correct that the Transfers disputed won and the Transfers disputed lost numbers are the same because for each case, there is a “winning” registrar and a “losing registrar”.  Likewise, the number of Transfers disputed nodecision cases should actually be divided by 2 as these numbers also would have two registrars that were parties to the case and neither prevailed.  Hope this helps to explain the numbers a bit.  Thank you.

 


     
      Barbara Knight
      Director of Registry Compliance
      bknight at Verisign.com

      m: 703-622-1071 t: 703-948-3343
      12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190

      VerisignInc.com

       
     <!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]-->
     

 

 

From: owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:01 AM
To: gnso-irtpd at icann.org
Subject: [gnso-irtpd] FW: TDRP stats

 

And just in case, you actually would like to see the promised spreadsheet …

Apologies,

Lars

 

 

From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann at icann.org>
Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 9:59 AM
To: "gnso-irtpd at icann.org" <gnso-irtpd at icann.org>
Subject: TDRP stats

 

Dear all,

 

In light of the Group's discussion on TDRP we have  been in touch with transfer dispute providers to provide us with data from the cases they receive. We will share this with the group as soon as we have received and collated the relevant information. 

 

In addition, we gathered some Registry-related TDRP data that might be useful to the discussion, too. I have attached a spreadsheet containing one sheet on the TDRP per TLD and a second sheet with an overview of the total number of TDRPs per month – both data sets are for the period of October 2009 to March 2013.

 

You might notice that the numbers for 'lost' and 'won' TDRP are exactly the same each month. As this is too much of a coincidence, we assume that these represent the same case (as one party lost it and another won it) -  but maybe a working group member of the RySG might be able to clarify further.  Assuming that our assumption is correct the breakdown per TLD shows that:

 

of 227 total cases between October 2009 and March 2013

 

224 concerned .com (94.3%)

11 concerned .net (4.8%)

2 concerned .pro (0.9%)

 

For those of you interested, the data for these tables were sourced from the monthly Registry Reports filed with ICANN, see http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/reports

 

With best wishes from rainy Brussels,

Lars

 

 

 

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-irtpd/attachments/20130426/3db60f7d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1593 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-irtpd/attachments/20130426/3db60f7d/image002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-irtpd/attachments/20130426/3db60f7d/image005.jpg>