[gnso-irtpd] here's the little summary of that sequence of events i rattled off on the call just now -- registrant role in TDRP
Rob Golding
rob.golding at astutium.com
Thu Dec 5 13:06:28 UTC 2013
> can you expand on why you prefer the idea that Compliance get's involved
> over making a determination?
Depends on your definition of 'determination' - I more expect them to review
things and prompt the registrar(s) as necessary (subject to previous posts
about fees) if policy has not been followed.
Afterall isn't compliance role/remit to ensure that all registrars follow
policy/process?
If a registrant thinks that is not what has been done, they already have the
option(s) to talk to compliance (and we all know registrants regularly talk
to them about complete nonsense/trivia anyway) .
> just looking for ideas on what the appropriate role would be for
> Compliance, not trying to mousetrap you.
The appropriate role would be for them to do their job, just their job and
only their job - and to apply/enforce those items of policy fairly and
consistently across all registrars...
Rob
More information about the Gnso-irtpd
mailing list