[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Latest Version of Compromise Closed Generic Text

[trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com]

Alex,

I would point out gust by taking the theory that ICANN and the new gTLD process is bound to serve the public interest and by extension closed generics are bound to serve the public interest to its logical extension that would mean that ANY registration requirements or restrictions on a new gTLD must be in the public interest. Is that the intent here? If not, it is the logical intent.

This also creates a new mission for ICANN that doesn't exist in the current bylaws.



Best Regards,

Marc H.Trachtenberg
Shareholder
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
77 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601
Office (312) 456-1020
Mobile (773) 677-3305

On Jul 13, 2020, at 8:00 AM, Alexander Schubert <alexander at schubert.berlin> wrote:

Is ICANN and the new gTLD process bound to serve the public interest – and should by extension closed generics bound to serve the public interest?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at postmaster at gtlaw.com, and do not use or disseminate the information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20200713/e33a7e53/attachment.html>