[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Accredited proxy providers vs unaccredited proxy providers

[Kathy Kleiman]

Susan,
Are we talking about changing the way UDRP and URS handle privacy/proxy 
situations? I think that is outside of the scope of this WG.
Best,
Kathy

On 11/16/2015 12:34 PM, Susan Kawaguchi wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have given more thought about  the discussion concerning  accredited 
> proxy vendors versus all other unaccredited proxy vendors, including 
> lawyers.   It seems to me that we are never going to be able to 
> capture each variation of the unaccredited proxy vendor and James 
> brought up a point that I think we should consider.
>
> If accredited proxy vendors adhere to all the requirements we are 
> describing they will have the benefit of not being considered the 
> registrant of the domain name.
>
> Any other type of unaccredited proxy service should simply not exist 
> and they should always be considered the registrant with all the 
> rights and liabilities that go along with being the registrant.  We 
> simply would not recognize any other existing relationship.
>
> We could make this very clear Accredited proxy or registrant and not 
> delve into all the grey areas.
>
> The unaccredited proxy provider would be considered the Registrant in 
> all actions including the URS and UDRP.
>
> I am hoping we can discuss further on the call tomorrow.
>
> Best,
>
> Susan Kawaguchi
> Facebook, Inc.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20151116/82dd1da1/attachment-0001.html>