[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Next AoC WHOIS Review

[Gomes, Chuck]

I suppose that the RT could be formed with a very narrow mission something like  the following:

1.       Identify what recommendations from the previous review have not yet been implemented and why.

2.       Decide if there are any Whois/RDS issues to be reviewed that are not going to be covered in the RDS PDP WG, and, if any, review and make recommendations on them.

3.       Prepare a report that includes a recommendation regarding the relationship of RDS PDP WG work and the next Whois Review in five years.

Of course this would still require forming the RT and holding RT meetings, which would still stretch resources, but the duplication could be limited to a large extent.

Chuck

From: Michele Neylon - Blacknight [mailto:michele at blacknight.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 2:55 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Metalitz, Steven; Andrew Sullivan; gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Next AoC WHOIS Review

All

While I agree with Steve that at one level the RT is out of scope, there is an impact on this WG.
If an RT on WHOIS is launched who is going to sit on it?
Unless I’m mistaken most of the people who would be best qualified to participate in any such RT or most likely to volunteer to do so are already involved in this WG.

I also agree that the timing etc., is not something that can be completely ignored.

But I don’t have any sane solutions for either issue.


Regards

Michele

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
http://www.blacknight.host/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://ceo.hosting/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160428/6e38cdbf/attachment.html>