[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Next AoC WHOIS Review

[Holly Raiche]

I totally agree with Michele (and others saying the same thing). 

 Just about anyone with an interest/expertise in the Whois issue is on this working group and already spending a lot of their time (apart from meetings) on the issues.  I don’t think there is the bandwidth to do anything else on Whois.  If there is still a belief that something should be done, then it should be after this group completes its work - or at least after Phase One has been completed.  At that stage, it will be clearer if there are any outstanding issues that have not been addressed by this group. Nothing else makes any sense

Holly


On 29 Apr 2016, at 4:54 am, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele at blacknight.com> wrote:

> All
> 
> While I agree with Steve that at one level the RT is out of scope, there is an impact on this WG.
> If an RT on WHOIS is launched who is going to sit on it?
> Unless I’m mistaken most of the people who would be best qualified to participate in any such RT or most likely to volunteer to do so are already involved in this WG.
> 
> I also agree that the timing etc., is not something that can be completely ignored.
> 
> But I don’t have any sane solutions for either issue.
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Michele
> 
> --
> Mr Michele Neylon
> Blacknight Solutions
> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
> http://www.blacknight.host/
> http://blog.blacknight.com/
> http://ceo.hosting/
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> -------------------------------
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160429/4bdf8383/attachment.html>