[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] DRAFT work plan for Phase 1

[Farell Folly]

Many thanks to Marika and Lisa respectively for their helpful assistance.

Le mardi 1 mars 2016, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> a écrit :

> Farell, all, you can find the WG wiki space here:
> https://community.icann.org/x/rjJ-Ag
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org');>> on
> behalf of Farell Folly <farellfolly at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','farellfolly at gmail.com');>>
> Date: Tuesday 1 March 2016 at 08:48
> To: Lisa Phifer <lisa at corecom.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lisa at corecom.com');>>, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <
> shollenbeck at verisign.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','shollenbeck at verisign.com');>>, Chuck Gomes <
> cgomes at verisign.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cgomes at verisign.com');>>,
> "gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org');>" <
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org');>>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] DRAFT work plan for Phase 1
>
> Hello,
>
> Can you or the staff provide me again with the link to the wiki ?
>
> Le mar. 1 mars 2016 à 15:43, Lisa Phifer <lisa at corecom.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lisa at corecom.com');>> a écrit :
>
>> Good morning Scott - staff will add RFC 7485 to the set of background
>> materials posted on the wiki.
>>
>>
>> At 07:08 AM 3/1/2016, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>>
>> Content-Language: en-US
>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>
>> boundary="_000_831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A37B30FBRN1WNEXMBX02vc_"
>>
>>
>>
>> Only one suggestion, Chuck. Looking at the questions posed in #12, I
>> wondered if question #1 (“Who should have access to gTLD registration data
>> and why?”) is indeed the first question we should ask. I would find it
>> helpful to understand what “gTLD registration data” is before I think about
>> who should have access to it, so I would like to suggest that the current
>> question #4 (“What data should be collected, stored, and disclosed?”) be
>> moved to question #1.
>>
>> When we get around to asking “What data should be collected, stored, and
>> disclosed?” it might be helpful to read RFC 7485
>> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7485>. It’s an inventory of
>> information that was available via WHOIS at the time the IETF’s WEIRDS
>> working group wrote the document. It might not be 100% accurate now, but I
>> believe it’s still the best summary of current practice.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> *From:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org');> [
>> mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org');>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Gomes, Chuck
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 29, 2016 4:14 PM
>> *To:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org');>
>> *Subject:* [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] DRAFT work plan for Phase 1
>> *Importance:* High
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who responded regarding the approach to a work plan
>> proposed by the Leadership Team in our meeting last week and online
>> afterwards. I understand that some of you may still have concerns about the
>> proposed approach but the Leadership Team decided that it might be more
>> effective to deal with any remaining concerns as we discuss and refine a
>> draft work plan.  So we prepared a DRAFT work plan for Phase 1 and have
>> attached it.  An overview of the plan will be provided in our WG meeting
>> tomorrow with opportunity for questions and initial discussion.  We will
>> continue to discuss the plan on this list after tomorrow’s meeting and
>> leading up to our Marrakech meeting on 9 March, at which time we will try
>> to finalize it if possible.
>>
>> Note that whatever we finalize a work plan will have to be flexible.  It
>> will have to be updated as we go depending on our actual progress.  Also
>> note, that the details for what are now steps 13 to 15 will have to be
>> developed after we finalize the results of step 12 and the preceding steps.
>>
>> We encourage all of you to at least do a quick review of this document
>> before our meeting tomorrow if possible.  Regardless, we ask everyone to
>> review it in detail after tomorrow’s call. If you are unable to participate
>> in the WG meeting tomorrow, in addition to reviewing the draft plan
>> thoroughly, please listen to the recording of the call.  We strongly
>> request everyone to communicate your questions and comments on the list so
>> that we can start to refine the plan online and be try to finalize it in
>> our meeting on 9 March.
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your cooperation and contributions.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org');>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org');>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
>

-- 
Meilleures salutations,

--ff--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160301/fd1dcbfe/attachment.html>