[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] DRAFT work plan for Phase 1

[Stephanie Perrin]

+1
Stephanie

On 2016-03-01 9:08, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>
> Only one suggestion, Chuck. Looking at the questions posed in #12, I 
> wondered if question #1 (“Who should have access to gTLD registration 
> data and why?”) is indeed the first question we should ask. I would 
> find it helpful to understand what “gTLD registration data” is before 
> I think about who should have access to it, so I would like to suggest 
> that the current question #4 (“What data should be collected, stored, 
> and disclosed?”) be moved to question #1.
>
> When we get around to asking “What data should be collected, stored, 
> and disclosed?” it might be helpful to read RFC 7485 
> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7485>. It’s an inventory of 
> information that was available via WHOIS at the time the IETF’s WEIRDS 
> working group wrote the document. It might not be 100% accurate now, 
> but I believe it’s still the best summary of current practice.
>
> Scott
>
> *From:*gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Gomes, Chuck
> *Sent:* Monday, February 29, 2016 4:14 PM
> *To:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] DRAFT work plan for Phase 1
> *Importance:* High
>
> Thanks to everyone who responded regarding the approach to a work plan 
> proposed by the Leadership Team in our meeting last week and online 
> afterwards. I understand that some of you may still have concerns 
> about the proposed approach but the Leadership Team decided that it 
> might be more effective to deal with any remaining concerns as we 
> discuss and refine a draft work plan.  So we prepared a DRAFT work 
> plan for Phase 1 and have attached it.  An overview of the plan will 
> be provided in our WG meeting tomorrow with opportunity for questions 
> and initial discussion.  We will continue to discuss the plan on this 
> list after tomorrow’s meeting and leading up to our Marrakech meeting 
> on 9 March, at which time we will try to finalize it if possible.
>
> Note that whatever we finalize a work plan will have to be flexible.  
> It will have to be updated as we go depending on our actual progress.  
> Also note, that the details for what are now steps 13 to 15 will have 
> to be developed after we finalize the results of step 12 and the 
> preceding steps.
>
> We encourage all of you to at least do a quick review of this document 
> before our meeting tomorrow if possible.  Regardless, we ask everyone 
> to review it in detail after tomorrow’s call. If you are unable to 
> participate in the WG meeting tomorrow, in addition to reviewing the 
> draft plan thoroughly, please listen to the recording of the call. We 
> strongly request everyone to communicate your questions and comments 
> on the list so that we can start to refine the plan online and be try 
> to finalize it in our meeting on 9 March.
>
> Thanks in advance for your cooperation and contributions.
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160301/2f65a7b4/attachment.html>