[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] DRAFT work plan for Phase 1

Thu Mar 3 12:37:53 UTC 2016

To facilitate ongoing discussion on the order of the draft work plan steps for the first five questions, here is what the first five steps would look like if we made the change suggested by Kathy in addition to the change suggested by Scott:

12a

Deliberate on Question 4<https://community.icann.org/display/gTLDRDS/Data+Elements+-+Key+Inputs> requirements (R4-1 etc. Data Elements: What data should be collected, stored, and disclosed?

Full WG

12b

Deliberate on Question 5<https://community.icann.org/display/gTLDRDS/Privacy+-+Key+Inputs> requirements (R5-1 etc. Privacy: What steps are needed to protect data and privacy?

Full WG

12c

Deliberate on Question 1<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56986720> requirements (R1-1 etc.) Users/Purposes: Who should have access to gTLD registration data and why?

Full WG

12d

Deliberate on Question 2<https://community.icann.org/display/gTLDRDS/Gated+Access+-+Key+Inputs> requirements (R2-1 etc.) Gated Access: What steps should be taken to control data access for each user/purpose?

Full WG

12e

Deliberate on Question 3<https://community.icann.org/display/gTLDRDS/Data+Accuracy+-+Key+Inputs> requirements (R3-1 etc.) Data Accuracy: What steps should be taken to improve data accuracy?

Full WG

For any of you have opinions on this additional change, please communicate them on this list by Monday, 7 March.

Chuck

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 10:37 AM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] DRAFT work plan for Phase 1

+1 Scott.

I am adding the recommendation that question #5 be moved to question #2. Question #2 would then become "What steps are needed to protect data and privacy" -- really the foundational question of what laws govern our evaluation of the collection, storage and disclosure of the data we will be discussing in #1?

Before moving on to "Who should have access to the gTLD registration data and why," it would help us to understand the requirements of law - particularly comprehensive data protection laws -- that differentiate the data collector/primary use (registrars) from secondary users who might seek additional access to the data, e.g., via the RDS directory. What are data collectors legally allowed to do with the personal data they collect, and what limits exist?  All seem a foundational understanding before we approach "Who should have access to the gTLD registration data and why."

Tx,
Kathy

On 3/1/2016 9:08 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:

Only one suggestion, Chuck. Looking at the questions posed in #12, I wondered if question #1 ("Who should have access to gTLD registration data and why?") is indeed the first question we should ask. I would find it helpful to understand what "gTLD registration data" is before I think about who should have access to it, so I would like to suggest that the current question #4 ("What data should be collected, stored, and disclosed?") be moved to question #1.

When we get around to asking "What data should be collected, stored, and disclosed?" it might be helpful to read RFC 7485<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7485>. It's an inventory of information that was available via WHOIS at the time the IETF's WEIRDS working group wrote the document. It might not be 100% accurate now, but I believe it's still the best summary of current practice.

Scott

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 4:14 PM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] DRAFT work plan for Phase 1
Importance: High

Thanks to everyone who responded regarding the approach to a work plan proposed by the Leadership Team in our meeting last week and online afterwards. I understand that some of you may still have concerns about the proposed approach but the Leadership Team decided that it might be more effective to deal with any remaining concerns as we discuss and refine a draft work plan.  So we prepared a DRAFT work plan for Phase 1 and have attached it.  An overview of the plan will be provided in our WG meeting tomorrow with opportunity for questions and initial discussion.  We will continue to discuss the plan on this list after tomorrow's meeting and leading up to our Marrakech meeting on 9 March, at which time we will try to finalize it if possible.

Note that whatever we finalize a work plan will have to be flexible.  It will have to be updated as we go depending on our actual progress.  Also note, that the details for what are now steps 13 to 15 will have to be developed after we finalize the results of step 12 and the preceding steps.

We encourage all of you to at least do a quick review of this document before our meeting tomorrow if possible.  Regardless, we ask everyone to review it in detail after tomorrow's call. If you are unable to participate in the WG meeting tomorrow, in addition to reviewing the draft plan thoroughly, please listen to the recording of the call.  We strongly request everyone to communicate your questions and comments on the list so that we can start to refine the plan online and be try to finalize it in our meeting on 9 March.

Thanks in advance for your cooperation and contributions.

Chuck

_______________________________________________

gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list

gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160303/d9f5879a/attachment.html>