[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Materials for next WG call

Ayden Férdeline icann at ferdeline.com
Sun Mar 20 11:01:44 UTC 2016


Hi Stephanie,

To your first email - is the attached document the one you were looking for?

Best wishes,

Ayden

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> Thanks very much for these materials Lisa.  Please let me reiterate a
> point that I guess has not registered yet.  The first question we have to
> ask is "what is the purpose of collecting, using, storing, and disclosing
> registration data?  If we agree on the narrow definition that was defined
> in the 2007 WHOIS task force report, then many of the current uses, as has
> been pointed out by the global data commissioners repeatedly, are not
> legitimate.  So lets agree on the purpose of data collection first. I am
> deeply concerned about the discussion of "requirements".  Here is the 2007
> definition:
>
>
> *The GNSO Council recommends that the WHOIS task force use the following
> definition: "The purpose of the gTLD WHOIS service is to provide
> information sufficient to contact a responsible party for a particular gTLD
> domain name who can resolve, or reliably pass on data to a party who can
> resolve, issues related to the configuration of the records associated with
> the domain name within a DNS name server." as a working definition to allow
> the task force to proceed on terms of reference (2), (3), and (4) *Note:
> the ICANN wiki says this is what we are doing:
> " The *Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory Services to Replace
> Whois Policy Development Process Working Group* (RDS-PDP-WG) has been
> established to redefine the purpose of gTLD registration data and to
> consider how to safeguard this data. It is also tasked with proposing a
> model for gTLD registration directory services that will address accuracy,
> privacy, and access issues. "
> If we are redefining the purpose of gTLD registration data, we should
> address that question first.
> cheers Stephanie
>
> On 2016-03-19 11:18, Lisa Phifer wrote:
>
> Greetings all,
>
> Attached please find materials developed by the leadership team to
> facilitate discussion during the next WG call. These materials include:
>
> (1) *A summary table of all work plan changes proposed thus far.* This
> serves as a consolidated record of all suggestions made to date during WG
> calls, meetings, and on the email list. Staff will continue to add any new
> suggestions made between now and the next WG call as new rows to the end of
> this table. This table is a tool to help all WG members easily recall and
> consider all of the suggestions made by everyone, before attempting to
> agree upon resolutions. In creating this table, we tried to extract and
> accurately paraphrase changes and rationale from lengthier email exchanges,
> but the WG's email archive ( http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg)
> can be consulted for all email message text in full. Italicized "Notes"
> have also been included to provide linkage between suggestions and related
> charter questions.
>
> (2) *A mind map of fundamental questions and sub-questions.* This serves
> as a concise illustration of the fundamental questions and sub-questions
> detailed in the Issue Report and Charter. This map can be adjusted as the
> WG agrees upon refinements to questions (including but not limited to
> sequencing) and adds new subquestions, inter-dependencies, further inputs,
> and detailed policies that should be "parked" for consideration during
> phases 2/3. This map is a tool to help the WG better understand and reach
> agreement on fundamental questions to be addressed in phase 1 by providing
> an overall picture as well as an opportunity to start thinking about
> additional sub-questions and whether there are certain questions that need
> to be considered before being able to address other questions, etc.
>
> (3) *A simple text listing of the questions and sub-questions in the mind
> map* - for those who may find a simple bullet list of questions in text
> format more useful than a mind map.
>
> We hope that the WG will find these materials to be a helpful starting
> point to facilitate further WG discussion on the phase 1 work plan.
>
> In addition, the leadership team is working on an annotated draft of the
> work plan itself, to be distributed on Monday for use during Tuesday's RDS
> PDP WG call.
>
> Best Regards,
> Lisa
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing listgnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160320/ab7d578a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: FINAL TF Report on Whois Summary and Recommendations - EN.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 278480 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160320/ab7d578a/FINALTFReportonWhoisSummaryandRecommendations-EN.pdf>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list