[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] GNSO Next-Gen RDS PDP Working Group teleconference

[Carlton Samuels]

+1.

The At-Large position - a simple refinement on Holly's here - has always
been to first acknowledge/decide the overarching organic question: Is there
a need for the collection of registration data, and, to what end?

When we agree here, matters such as what we collect and for cause will all
come out in the wash.

I should think the road to consensus will be a lot less traveled and, with
better results enabled for all of us. Much of that required would be an
obligation to affirm what is already done and/or to revise and extend.

Let us exercise good common-sensical judgment and resist the temptation to
re-invent wheels.

-Carlton


==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net>
wrote:

>
> >
> >
> > Folks
> >
> > I still have very  real questions about the order of discussion topics
> in Phase 1 of the work plan.
> >
> > In item 8, the main topic is ‘develop initial possible requirements
> lis’t, starting from Questions posed by the Charter.  Yet it isn’t until
> item 12 that we deliberate on possible fundamental requirements.
> >
> > I am guessing that, to make sense of the order listed, we are to start
> with a list of all possible requirements (item 8) and by item 12, have the
> discussion as to what of the possible requirements should be accepted and
> what ‘requirements' will not be.
> >
> > From a data protection perspective (that governs all EU countries,
> Canada, Australia and many other countries), the place to start is to ask
> what information - particularly personal information - an
> individual/organisation NEEDS to collect in order to carry out their
> task/business.  And ONLY that data is collected.  Other data protection
> steps follow: the personal information that is collected must only be used
> for the purpose(s) for which it was collected, and the information is only
> disclosed to the individuals/organisations that should have access.
> >
> > So I am assuming that, at item 12 at the latest, those of us living
> under data protection legislation will look at the list of possible
> ‘requirements' and insist that only that information that is required for
> carrying on the business of a registrar or registry is gathered.  The
> questions that follow are then about how that limited information is used,
> and how that limited information is disclosed.
> >
> > If that is not what is intended by the Work Plan, then we must have the
> discussion on what information is collected at item 8.
> >
> > And while the EWG is a very useful report and a good place, amongst
> others, to start, we will not necessarily wind up in the same place that it
> did - and let’s not assume we will.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Holly
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160320/b7f3bfea/attachment.html>