[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Fwd: Article 29 Data protection working party opinion on legitimate interests of the Data Controller

[Stephanie Perrin]

Aha, sorry for the oversight, I just fired it off to the first one in 
the queue.  Thanks for explaining this, I had not noticed!
cheers Stephanie

On 2016-03-23 14:54, Nathalie Peregrine wrote:
> Dear Stephanie and all,
>
> Only staff can post to the ntfy lists as these are for dial in detail 
> distribution only.
> Gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org is the discussion mailing list for the 
> Purpose sub team members.
>
> There are always 2 mailing lists per Working Group and sub team, the 
> ntfy list for conference calls, and the mailing list without “ntfy” in 
> front which is for members to discuss on.
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> Nathalie
> From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org 
> <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Stephanie 
> Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca 
> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>>
> Date: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 at 7:35 PM
> To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>" 
> <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
> Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Fwd: Article 29 Data protection working 
> party opinion on legitimate interests of the Data Controller
>
>
> Since my first post to the sub-group was (sob) rejected, I take the 
> liberty of sending it to the whole list.  Also of interest to the 
> privacy group, and doubtless the data elements group, so I make no 
> apology. This is not a simple opinion, but it is thorough.
> cheers Stephanie
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	Article 29 Data protection working party opinion on 
> legitimate interests of the Data Controller
> Date: 	Wed, 23 Mar 2016 13:31:05 -0400
> From: 	Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
> To: 	ntfy-gnso-rds-pdp-purpose at icann.org
>
>
>
> For those wishing to understand how data protection commissioners manage
> the interpretation of purpose and legitimate interests, you may find the
> Opinion 06/2014 which the group published as a resource during the
> recent negotiation of the European Regulation on data protection.  It is
> long, but thorough, and is available on the website at
> http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2014/wp217_en.pdf.
> Pages 27-30, in my view, are particularly relevant to our discussions,
> but I defer to practitioners in EU privacy law for their views.
> Cheers Stephanie Perrin
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20160324/bf341ff7/attachment.html>