[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Principle on Proportionality for "Thin Data"access

[allison nixon]

>>If someone was determined to use that information for abuse, they could
do WHOIS lookups every day to determine if a domain had expired anyway,
right?

Or query for the A record repeatedly and watch for when it reverts back to
parking...

OR, when it comes to systems that perform blocking, simply block the very
first time a domain has been seen and start the counter from there...

>>Well, coming from 'self-proclaimed internet crime investigators' the term
stings less than intended...
I use the phrase because it's clear that they're going to ruin a number of
other efforts to maintain privacy and confidentiality- in the name of their
privacy sacred cow. It's clearly a failure of advocacy when that happens.
The term may have offended, but I don't take it back. You in particular
have been calling names since the very beginning, but I have a slightly
thicker skin.

Also your suggestion that those data elements can be abused is
high-larious. Please continue.


On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Tom Lancaster <tom.lancaster.sec at gmail.com>
wrote:

> If someone was determined to use that information for abuse, they could do
> WHOIS lookups every day to determine if a domain had expired anyway, right?
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>



-- 
_________________________________
Note to self: Pillage BEFORE burning.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170601/b4c727b8/attachment.html>