[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Why the thin data is necessary

[Sam Lanfranco]

As a participant in this pdp-wg discussion who will not be at the ICANN 
meetings in Johannesburg I am probably speaking for many who will not be 
there. We hope and pray that this rds-pdp-wg spends the time in 
Johannesburg agreeing that /we have passed these four milestones/ on our 
long march to policy recommendations, and it is now time to move on to 
the rest of our tasks.

Sam Lanfranco


On 6/7/2017 10:13 AM, Greg Aaron wrote:
>
> Yes. Our Working Group has:
>
>   * defined what the thin fields are,
>   * has heard excellent reasons to publish it,
>   * has not heard any compelling reasons to withhold the thin data
>     from publication.
>   * Had decent consensus that any kind of authentication or gating for
>     access to thin data is not desirable.
>
> The discussion of the above has been pretty exhaustive.   I suggest to 
> the leadership that confirming and moving on from these issues is very 
> important by Johannesburg.  This WG has been open for one-and-a-half 
> years now, needs to show some progress, and the endless re-opening of 
> issues is not fair to any of the volunteers.
>
> All best,
>
> --Greg
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170607/01e976ca/attachment.html>