[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Who is in charge? (was Re: Why the thin data is necessary)]

[Stephanie Perrin]

Calling me naive, ill informed etc.  does not actually answer the 
question folks. It is, I am afraid, a valid question.  What criteria 
does an organization like APWG apply, when it admits members and shares 
data with them?  How do you ensure you are not sharing data with 
organizations who are going to misuse it?  that data of course is much 
more that what we are talking about with thin data, but I did actually 
work on this issue on successive versions of the anti-spam legislation.  
Oddly enough, government lawyers examining the issue (mostly from the 
competition bureau who deal with criminal matters) never labelled me 
"naive".

Folks, can we please try to be polite to one another on this list?  When 
I have questions like this, I often check with experts before I ask.  
They don't call me naive, they answer my questions.

Thanks again.

Stephanie


On 2017-06-08 01:54, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
> My experience differs slightly. They aren’t ignored. The presence of 
> these .TLDs is a strong indicator of abuse which bears further 
> investigation.
>
> To the point at hand: I believe the notion of certifying private 
> cybercrime investigators to be painfully naive (do I ignore reports 
> from someone without a Internet Investigator License? Do we disallow 
> them access to data?), impractical in the developed world, and deeply 
> chauvinistic, patronizing and exclusionary to our colleagues in 
> emerging nations where capacity building is exactly what’s needed to 
> deal with next-gen abuse.
>
>
>> On Jun 8, 2017, at 2:36 AM, allison nixon <elsakoo at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:elsakoo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> We're getting there. Entire top level domains are already ignored on 
>> many networks like .science, .xyz, .pw, .top, .club, et cetera
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170608/de94dbe9/attachment.html>