[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] The thin data

Andrew Sullivan ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Thu Jun 8 15:04:48 UTC 2017


On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 05:32:52AM -0400, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
> has influence over who gets access to the next tier of data. Let me repeat
> for greater clarity: I am not talking about thin data.

So we agree that the list of data that we had in the example I posted
several months ago, plus the data about DNSSEC that Jim Galvin
suggested on the call, is all fine and we can stop debating whether it
needs access controls?  I would be pleased in that case, and then we
could move on to a real problem.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list