[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] URGENT: babypool GDPR Question

[Paul Keating]

Public is public.

What part of that does the registrant not understand?

Sent from my iPad

> On 14 Jun 2017, at 17:41, John Bambenek via gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> "When a registrant register a domain name their personal details should only be disclosed to third parties for a purpose to which such registrant agrees to prior to the disclosure. And I think you will agree that having your details transmitted to every marketing company out there wouldn’t qualify as a legitimate purpose"
> 
> No, we don't agree. Because I have a right to information that will help me verify who is trying to communicate with me. If you have a problem with your information being public and used for any purpose whatsoever, the use whois privacy / proxy registration (which should be free). Use a role-based email.
> 
> This. Is. A. Solved. Problem. 
> 
> Your choice should be this. Enable (free) privacy protection on your domain or your info can be used by anyone for any reason. Literally exactly like twitter and facebook which has a whole lot more privacy sensitive info. The only thing that needs to be done is registrars telling users what this means. And we're happy to write that for you. 
> 
> --
> John Bambenek
> 
>> On Jun 14, 2017, at 11:05, Luc SEUFER <lseufer at dclgroup.eu> wrote:
>> 
>> When a registrant register a domain name their personal details should only be disclosed to third parties for a purpose to which such registrant agrees to prior to the disclosure. And I think you will agree that having your details transmitted to every marketing company out there wouldn’t qualify as a legitimate purpose
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg