[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] List topics for this week

[Paul Keating]

So I seem to see three camps here. 

1. Those who want not change to a system that has worked for 20 years or whatever. 

2. Those who object to the current WHOIS on the basis of privacy issues. 

2. Those who really want a way to monetize the data at issue instead of allowing it to be available without charge. 

Am I missing something here?

If not then perhaps these divisions can actually help us all move forward. 


Sincerely,
Paul Keating, Esq.

> On Jun 16, 2017, at 2:41 PM, John Bambenek via gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> One, it is not enforced taxation, it is a requirement that was present in the contract and a requirement BEFORE you got into the business. It isn't something imposed out of the blue one day. It has literally been there for decades. 
> 
> Two, is it really necessary to make your point with crude sexual analogies (or am I mistaken as to what you meant by BDSM)?
> 
> --
> John Bambenek
> 
>>> On Jun 16, 2017, at 04:01, Rob Golding <rob.golding at astutium.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 2017-06-15 17:43, Chen, Tim wrote:
>>> Using the arguments you have made about individual control over PII,
>>> what right does my chosen registrar or registry have to get
>>> compensated for my whois data?   Put another way, I get your point
>>> about 'recompense to registrants' but I don't understand how you can
>>> add in '& registrars & registries' unless an individual has explicitly
>>> given permission to those companies to monetize their whois data?
>> 
>> It was bereft of significant design consideration/comment over the "systems and processing", but to me, I would expect that someone has to collect/protect the data, run the system(s), distribute the (probably micro-)payments, provide audit/reports and so on - those things cost money, so was anticipating a sort-of revenue share model, rather than direct monetisation as such
>> 
>> If we're going to have a "next-gen" RDS, why not make it a benefit to the registrants, rather than compounding the current system of enforced taxation for mandatory port-43 based BDSM we have now.
>> 
>> Rob
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg