[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed Edits of Thin Element Purposes and Rationales

[jonathan matkowsky]

Just a quick note that I am in midst of moving to Seattle from Israel, and
have really limited availability in the 10 days. My regrets, in advance!

On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 at 10:23 PM Lisa Phifer <lisa at corecom.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> The comments cited in the redline are located in poll results:
>
> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078630/AnnotatedResults-Poll-from-13JuneCall-v4.pdf
> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64078630/AnnotatedResults-Poll-from-13JuneCall-v4.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1497895851200&api=v2>
>
> The redline does not replace poll results. It only attempts to depict poll
> comments that proposed specific changes.
>
> You still want to read the poll results to get a more fullsome sense of
> all comments made.
>
> Also note that, in some cases, several similar comments were made (for
> example, several related comments are simply listed in Q5). In such cases,
> all related comments can be discussed together when considering related
> (and sometimes contradictory) proposed edits.
>
> Best, Lisa
>
>
>
>
> At 12:26 PM 6/20/2017, Gomes, Chuck via gnso-rds-pdp-wg wrote:
>
> A lot of suggested edits were made in the comments contained in last
> week’s poll.  The attached file redlines them to make them easy to find.
> Please review them before the WG call tomorrow (tonight for some).
>
> To save time in our meeting, Lisa made edits to the document that Andrew
> originally prepared that reflect the comments submitted in last week’s
> poll.  Relevant comments from the poll are identified in the Data Element
> column (1st column) and color coded with any edits proposed in the other
> columns.
>
> In our WG meeting we will be looking at and discussing the proposed edits
> as a whole for each of these categories:
>
>    1. Proposed data element deletions as shown in the EWG Purposes column
>    and in two cells of the Publication Rationale column.
>    2. Proposed edits in the Collection Rationale column.
>    3. Proposed edits in the Publication Rationale column.
>
>
> If everyone reviews the proposed edits before the WG call, we should be
> able to decide fairly quickly which of the edits should be accepted.  For
> those who cannot be on the call, we plan to confirm decisions made via a
> poll after the meeting.
>
> Chuck
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-- 
jonathan matkowsky, vp - ip & head of global brand threat mitigation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20170620/7b2a51f7/attachment.html>